Lee address to International Whaling Commission
21 May 2002
Hon Sandra Lee Speech Notes
INTERVENTION
BY THE HON SANDRA LEE, MINISTER OF CONSERVATION, TO THE 54TH
MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL WHALING COMMISSION (IWC 54) ON
THE SUBJECT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC WHALE
SANCTUARY
Shimonoseki, Japan.
Mr Chairman
Nga mihi
nui kia koe
Greetings to you
This is the third time
that it has been my privilege as Minister of Conservation
from New Zealand to present to the Commission a proposal to
establish a South Pacific Whale Sanctuary to protect the
great whales in their breeding grounds in our region.
At
IWC 52 and 53, although our proposal fell short of the
three-quarters majority required, New Zealand was pleased at
the significant majority support that the South Pacific
Whale Sanctuary did receive.
Mr Chair, New Zealand and
Australia wish delegates to clearly understand that the
overwhelming majority of Pacific Island Nations aspire to
the creation of the sanctuary for our region.
This is
confirmed by the Apia Declaration, to which I referred last
year.
For the record, please also note the 2001 Pacific
Islands Forum Communique, which states that Forum leaders
reached a:
Consensus agreement to pursue the objectives
of the proposal for a South Pacific Whale Sanctuary through
national, regional and international actions and endorsing
the statement that emerged from the Pacific Whale
Consultation held in Apia in April
All Forum leaders were
present, except the Solomon Islands.
I have listened
carefully to the expressions of frustration articulated by
some delegations in the debates on a range of issues to
date.
We, the people of the Pacific region, have also
felt frustrated at the failure to have the South Pacific
Whale Sanctuary adopted by the IWC.
At least in part as
a result of this frustration, a number of Pacific Island
states and territories who are not IWC members have taken
their own individual initiatives, as Australia has already
pointed out, and they have either declared their Exclusive
Economic Zones as Whale Sanctuaries, or have begun a formal
legislative process to do so.
Since the last IWC
meeting, sanctuaries have been declared by:
* The Cook
Islands;
* French Polynesia;
* Papua New Guinea; and
only last week by
* Niue.
In addition, whales are
fully protected in Tonga, both by Royal Decree and by
legislation.
Furthermore, a number of South Pacific
countries have recently convened workshops to consider the
status of whale populations in their waters and the economic
benefits that may accrue from whale watching. These
include:
* Papua New Guinea
* Fiji
* Solomon
Islands
Mr Chairman, I continue to hear very misleading
and unscientific arguments about the alleged impacts of
whales on fish stocks - the most recent example being a
large advertisement placed by the Institute of Cetacean
Research in yesterday's Japan Times.
Let me once again
state for the record that the vast majority of baleen whales
in the South Pacific, and indeed in the Southern Hemisphere,
do not feed on fish.
They consume krill in the Southern
Ocean during our summer months, and do not eat during their
lengthy migrations to and from their breeding grounds in
tropical latitudes.
Mr Chairman, Pacific Island nations
rely heavily on the sustainable harvesting of tuna and other
fish species.
As I have previously observed in this
forum, it is a surreal argument to blame whales for the
problem of declining fish stocks. In the years when whale
populations were significantly larger, so too were fish
stocks.
If we want to find the real culprit for the
depletion of fish stocks, a simple examination of human
activity, including over-fishing, pollution and the general
degradation and decline of the marine environment and its
biodiversity, is all that is required.
New Zealand would
like to thank those nations who have supported the South
Pacific Whale Sanctuary proposal.
We would also urge
others to join our cause, and in particular, we hope that
the Small Island States of the Caribbean will review their
previous position of vehement opposition and will support
the aspirations of those of us from the islands of the
Pacific on this issue.
Mr Chairman, it should not be lost
on the delegates to the IWC that New Zealand will not resile
from its desire to provide sanctuary in the breeding grounds
of our region to complement the sanctuary on their feeding
grounds in the Southern Ocean.
In conclusion, the New
Zealand Government would like to make it clear that our aim
to achieve a South Pacific Whale Sanctuary is not based on a
moral judgment of any other countries' cultures or
histories.
We openly concede that historically, New
Zealand's commercial whaling practices contributed to the
population decline of the great whales of our region.
But
in an age when we have come to realise that global
co-operation is essential if we are to avert a worldwide
collapse of biodiversity, the South Pacific Whale Sanctuary
should be seen simply for what it is - a progressive move
forward in the protection of the ocean's greatest
creatures.
I have heard many eloquent speeches at this IWC
meeting, but for my concluding remarks, I will have to
borrow the words of a writer far more eloquent than I, who
wrote:
So that is all, but it is not enough; but perhaps
it will remind you that we are still here. It is like the
man who carried a brick with him, to show the world what his
house was like.
No reira, tena koutou, tena koutou, tena koutou katoa.
Ends