Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Response to Matrimonial Property Amendment Bill

MEDIA RELEASE
FROM THE FAMILY LAW SECTION
of the New Zealand Law Society

Response to Matrimonial Property Amendment Bill & SOP 25

Family lawyers say that model agreements for contracting out of the new Matrimonial Property legislation will mean fewer safeguards for the public, and ultimately an increase in litigation and costs.
They are also concerned that provisions designed to redress economic disparity between separating couples could create uncertainty and they would like to see the distinction between core property (the matrimonial home and chattels) and other property retained so that justice can be achieved in particular cases.
These concerns have been raised in a statement released by the New Zealand Law Society’s Family Law Section, which represents family lawyers in New Zealand.
“Although presented as a cost-saving step, model agreements for contracting out of the legislation are likely to result in less protection for the public, particularly the vulnerable and low paid,” said the section’s spokesperson on matrimonial property, Mary O’Dwyer.
“Currently, anyone making an agreement about matrimonial property must have independent legal advice about the agreement’s implications before signing it. And lawyers are obliged to ensure that there is full disclosure of assets and debts and fair valuation of the property involved.
“With model agreements, however, there is no guarantee that there will be an obligation to fully disclose assets and to ensure that the agreement carefully matches the individual circumstances of the people involved. This means people entering into these agreements will have less protection and when such agreements prove to be seriously unjust, we will have more litigation and costs.
“We are opposed to less protection for people. Entering into property agreements is an extremely important financial step made at emotionally vulnerable times. People need careful, thorough and sound legal advice. No agreement should be able to be made without proper explanation by a lawyer.
“The detail for these proposals is to be in regulations rather than the primary legislation but we would like to see that detail made public now so it can be fully debated,” Mary O’Dwyer said.
Other areas of concern are:
 the new test of ‘seriously unjust’ to set aside agreements, which will create more litigation. The current well understood test of ‘unfair and unjust’ is being abandoned and courts will have to start afresh;
 the potential uncertainty created by provisions for lump sum or property transfer orders to redress economic disparity; and
 the loss of the current distinction between core property (house and chattels) and other property – a distinction that has helped achieve justice in particular cases.
“These areas have the potential to result in increased litigation for separating couples and therefore higher costs,” Mary O’Dwyer said.
The section supports certain changes made by the Select Committee, including:
 a clear and detailed definition of ‘de facto relationship’;
 retention of the terms ‘husband’, ‘wife’, ‘spouse’ and ‘marriage’ to reflect the status of married couples; and
 provision of statements of purpose and principles to assist in the interpretation of the legislation.
The section also supports a widespread public education campaign about the new legislation which it says should take place early in 2001 if the bill is passed this year.

ENDS

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The US Opposition To Mortgage Interest Deductibility For Landlords


Should landlords be able to deduct the interest on the loans they take out to bankroll their property speculation? The US Senate Budget Committee and Bloomberg News don't think this is a good idea, for reasons set out below. Regardless, our coalition government has been burning through a ton of political capital by giving landlords a huge $2.9 billion tax break via interest deductibility, while still preaching the need for austerity to the disabled, and to everyone else...
More


 
 

Government: Concerns Conveyed To China Over Cyber Activity
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government. “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity... More

ALSO:


Government: GDP Decline Reinforces Government’s Fiscal Plan

Declining GDP for the December quarter reinforces the importance of restoring fiscal discipline to public spending and driving more economic growth, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says... More

ALSO:


Government: Humanitarian Support For Gaza & West Bank

Winston Peters has announced NZ is providing a further $5M to respond to the extreme humanitarian need in Gaza and the West Bank. “The impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict on civilians is absolutely appalling," he said... More


Government: New High Court Judge Appointed

Judith Collins has announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister Jason Scott McHerron as a High Court Judge. Justice McHerron graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in English Literature in 1994 and an LLB in 1996... More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.