Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Recalling experience of leaky homes: 30 years back


by Ian Ritchie

My first, first hand experience of a leaky home was almost 30 years ago: a two year old, two storey house on two acres. We moved in while the subdivision title was coming through.

It rained and the water flowed across the inside lower floor.

I refused to complete an unconditional contract. At that stage there was only one legal precedent for doing this in the Commonwealth. I finished up getting my deposit back after declining to buy it for half? the price on an 'as is where is' basis. A "mediation" session was involved with the City Engineer and City Building Inspector. I knew that the extensive file on the house had disappeared, a promised enquiry had not taken place, the alcoholic building inspector at the time had been prematurely retired. One of my main memories is that during the meeting I called the City Building Inspector a liar and at the end of the meeting he shook me by the hand, I think respectfully.

What made the difference was that I held the trump card and got what I wanted.

After that I followed the reporting of "similar" cases in New Zealand. The government department most interested shortly after decided to move towards law changes top absolve local authorities from responsibility for inappropriate permits or inspections.

My next experience of mediation was at a Disputes Tribunal as a support person. Informal - no way. The one thing that really impressed me was that nothing the complainant said carried any wait unless the offending company representatives agreed, which they had no intention of doing. The result was that while the company responsible for the totally inadequate job was slightly inconvenienced, the complainant essentially got nothing.

I have heard the same story from Tenancy Tribunal hearings and other Disputes Tribunal hearings.

'No lawyers involved' means, as some current 'leaking home owners' who have been through the process have said, that the power lies with the company. The complainant has no power or leverage at all. Generally everything they say will be contested, their word will not be accepted unless every point is supported by an independent professional expert on the matter.

The mediator at the hearing I was at was intent on a settlement and went for the lowest, least significant point for settlement and then persuaded the parties, neither of whom wanted it, to agree as there was no other way forward, and it was what he would have ruled if he had had to.

In the case of the government's 'Leaky Homes Mediation Service', there is no power to enforce, the same limitations will apply and I suggest that few if any 'leaky home' owners will be dealing with sufficiently willing other parties to enable a satisfactory result for them, to be achieved.

The confidentiality of settlements also makes the system a farce as it means that there are no precedents set that can be used as bargaining chips.

The only effective course I can see is for 'leaky home owners' with a common target / company / developer etc to get together to take a class court action, to gain the strength to fight for the chance of a decent settlement.

All the best

Ian Ritchie

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Supreme Court: Worksafe Decision On Whittall Pike River Prosecution Unlawful

The question in issue on the appeal was whether WorkSafe New Zealand acted to give effect to an unlawful agreement of this nature when it offered no evidence on charges against Peter William Whittall for breaches of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992...

The Supreme Court... has found that the decision to offer no evidence was made under an unlawful agreement to stifle prosecution. It has granted a declaration to that effect. More>>

 

Cullen To Chair: Tax Working Group Terms Of Reference Announced

Finance Minister Grant Robertson and Revenue Minister Stuart Nash today announced the Terms of Reference for the Tax Working Group and that the Group will be chaired by Sir Michael Cullen. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them. More>>

ALSO:

Not Going Swimmingly: Contractor Cut, New Dates For Christchurch Sports Centre

“As an incoming Minister, I have been conducting a thorough review of progress on the Anchor projects and to learn of a $75 million budget blowout on this project was very disappointing..." More>>

ALSO:

Tertiary: Allowances, Loan Living Costs To Get Boost

“From 1 January, student allowance base rates and the maximum amount students can borrow for living costs will rise by a net $50 a week,” says Education Minister Chris Hipkins... further adjusted from 1 April 2018 in line with any increase in the CPI. More>>

ALSO:

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election