Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search


Rates Paper Issued


9 November 2002

Rates Paper Issued

“Auckland City Council’s prudent financial management means it is possible to hold rates at a real level in 2003/2004,” says the chairperson of the Finance and Corporate Business Committee Councillor Douglas Armstrong.

Auckland City today released its 2003/2004 rating policy issues paper in preparation for the council’s annual plan direction setting meeting on Thursday, 14 November 2002.

“We want to keep any rates increase within the rate of inflation. Officers have prepared a paper on this basis and an estimate of 2 per cent has been used at this stage of the annual plan process.”

The paper recommends increasing the uniform annual charge (UAC) for waste management services from $47 to $95, as foreshadowed last year, to obtain the 2 per cent or $6.23 million estimated to be necessary to preserve the council’s current income level.

The paper also acknowledges that the residential sector’s rates will increase due to both the 2002 revaluation and the possible future Auckland Regional Council levy. For these reasons, officers have recommended that current differentials be retained for a further year rather than implementing the fifth step of the council’s 10-year commitment to decrease rate loadings for the business community.

The UAC represents a contribution from all ratepayers to the cost of operating the city’s waste management services. The revaluation has the effect of redistributing rates according to changes in annual value compared to the average. The relative differentials represent the rates paid by different groups compared to the residential group.

“Even if we decide to increase our rubbish charge to $95, Auckland City still charges less than the $121 per service it costs us to actually run the city’s waste management services, and considerably less than the annual charges levied by the other regional local authorities. (Please see UAC table attached). Increasing the rubbish charge would also mean that the impact of the 2002 revaluation will be evened out across residential ratepayers,” says Councillor Armstrong.

“The 2002 revaluation differential simply redistributes the rates between property owners. For every increase there will be a decrease and the council does not receive any additional income. If the annual value of your property increases more than the average, then it is only fair that your share of the rates pie increases.

“I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation to delay the fifth step of increasing the residential rates loading. Residential property owners will have to pay more rates because of their greater than average increases in annual valuation. The council does not want to burden residential property owners with an additional fifth step increase.

“The key issues in this rates policy paper are restricting the rates increase to no more than the rate of inflation and managing the redistribution between different rating groups. Discussion and debate has already started and will continue from now until draft numbers are finalised in March 2003 and 1 July 2003 when the new rates are struck. The council will carefully consider the views of residents and ratepayers when it consults the public on the draft annual plan,” Councillor Armstrong concludes.


Attachments: Table 1
Table 2

Ref: SL

Table 1: Impact of the key issues and rating options on ratepayer groups (these numbers are GST inclusive, and are all based on rates being held constant in real terms).

2002/03 2003/04
Rating category Total rates for Auckland City purposes1 Status Quo: rates differentials the same as for 2002/2003 – changes in rates due to the impact of the 2002 revaluation on general rates Impact of generating additional 2% revenue requirement by increasing the UAC for waste management to $95 Impact of implementing 5th step of phased differential strategy on general rates
Change from 2002/03 rates
$m $m % change $m % change $m % change
Residential 139.305 +4.459 3.2% +6.019 4.3% +1.764 1.3%
Non-Residential 94.078 -0.774 -0.8% +0.191 0.2% -0.305 -0.3%
CBD Non-Residential 70.340 -3.930 -5.6% +0.014 0.0% -1.479 -2.1%
GBI Non-Residential 0.085 +0.016 19.2% +0.002 2.1% +0.009 10.8%
Rural 1 0.587 +0.210 35.7% +0.004 0.6% +0.010 1.7%
Rural 2 0.050 +0.021 41.5% +0.000 0.9% +0.001 1.8%
Rural 3 0.000 +0.000 0.0% +0.000 0.0% +0.000 0.0%
Total 304.445 0.000 0.0% +6.230 2.0% 0.000 0.0%
Official rating differentials
Residential 100% 100% 100% 100%
Non-Residential 196.1% 196.1% 196.1% 193%
CBD Non-Residential 255.9% 255.9% 255.9% 247%
GBI Non-Residential 179% 179% 179% 193%
Rural 1 86% 86% 86% 86%
Rural 2 25% 25% 25% 25%
Rural 3 0% 0% 0% 0%

1. The 2002/03 rates revenue for Auckland City purposes excludes the portion generated to collect the ARC levy, rates received from those ratepayers receiving 50% mandatory remissions and other doubtful debts, to create a suitable baseline for comparison with the 2003/2004 rates estimates.

Table 2: Comparison of local authorities and the use of annual charges for 2002/03

Local authority Annual charges (excl water and sewerage) Amount (incl GST) Additional information
Auckland Region
Auckland Waste management charge $47 No additional charges for waste; the residual cost (not covered by the UAC) is currently covered by the general rate
Manukau Annual general charge $460
Waste/recycling charge $126 No additional charge for waste
North Shore Annual general charge $593.09
Waste recycling charge $26.16 Additional charge for waste bags – up to an annual figure of $135.20 for 120 litres per week collected
Waitakere Annual general charge $510
People’s Park charge $9
Waste collection charge $17 Additional charge for waste bags – up to an annual figure of $104 for 120 litres per week collected
Other major local authorities
Christchurch General charge $105
Hamilton None …
Wellington None …

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Peters/Ardern Triumph

There are a lot of good reasons to feel joyful about this outcome. It is what so many young voters – the best hope for the country’s future – wanted.

Far more important than the implications for the Economy Gods ( is the dollar up or down? ) last night’s outcome will also mean many, many vulnerable New Zealanders will have a better life over the next three years at least.

Yet the desire for change was in the majority, across the country..>>>More


Labour on its agreement |Peters: Post-Election Announcement Speech | Greenpeace “cautiously hopeful” about new Government | ACT - Madman on the loose | E tū ecstatic | Chamber welcomes the outcome | Greens on their joining Govt | EDS welcomes new govt | Immigrant groups worry | Feds ready to engage new coalition government | Labour Ministers of the Crown announced


Climate: Increasing Greenhouse Emissions Hit NZ

New Zealand is seeing impacts of excess greenhouse gas emissions in our climate and oceans, according to the latest national report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ about the state of the atmosphere and climate…More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>


Rorschach Restructuring: PSA Taking Inland Revenue To Court Over Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>


Nuclear Disarmament: Nobel Peace Prize 2017 Awarded To ICAN

Congratulations from iCAN Aotearoa New Zealand to international iCAN, the other iCAN national campaigns and partner organisations, and the countless organisations and individuals who have worked so hard for a nuclear weapons-free world since 1945. More>>


Expenses: Waikato DHB CEO Resigns

An independent inquiry has identified that Dr Murray had spent more than the agreed $25K allocated for relocation costs, and other unauthorized expenses involving potential financial breaches of the chief executive’s obligations. More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Sad About The Trolley Buses?

The Regional Council’s MetLink is today spending money to tell us that it really loves Wellington’s trolley buses, even though they’re all being taken off our roads by the end of this month. More>>


Post-Election: Preliminary Coalition Talks Begin

New Zealand First will hold post-election preliminary discussions in Wellington with the National Party tomorrow morning and the Labour Party tomorrow afternoon. More>>




Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election