Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Court of Appeal exonerates council staff

Court of Appeal exonerates council staff

The Court of Appeal has independently found claims of malice against two Auckland City Council employees were unjustified.

The charges of malice relate to a dispute between Waiheke Island property developer, Adrian Chisholm, and the council which has been before the courts several times.

The Court of Appeal last week ruled against Mr Chisholm who was appealing a High Court judge’s decision which dismissed his claim for damages against the council.

The case relates to a development Mr Chisholm proposed in 1997. Mr Chisholm claims the council thwarted his efforts to build a multi-million dollar resort on Waiheke Island, when it intended to dump septage (accumulated material from septic tanks which has to be disposed of) on the golf course adjoining the property Mr Chisholm was going to develop.

Mr Chisholm claimed the resort project became untenable and the council had caused its downfall which could not be revived.

In his decision last year, Mr Justice Chambers ruled against all of Mr Chisholm’s claims which included charges of misfeasance (abuse of power) from which the malice claims stemmed, negligence, and claims under the Bill of Rights and the Fair Trading Act.

Mr Chisholm and two companies with which he is associated, brought their appeal on the basis that Mr Justice Chambers was in error when he dismissed their claim for damages against the council.

The Court of Appeal decision dealt at length with the claim of malice against the two officers, Mr McQuillan and Mr Paterson, and found the allegations of malice were unjustified.

“Having independently considered the matter ourselves, we are of the same mind as the judge,” the Court of Appeal judgement said.

“We consider the evidence …falls well short of proof to the necessary level for a serious allegation of the present kind that either Mr McQuillan or Mr Paterson were motivated by malice against Mr Chisholm in what they did and decided.”

The Court ruled that the appellants failed on all three issues, dismissed the appeal and awarded costs of $5000 to the council.

Auckland City is still pursuing costs awarded to it from the High Court case.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>

ALSO:

Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election