Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Open letter Regarding V8 Race Polling Methods

Open letter Regarding V8 Race Polling Methods

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

Urgent & Important. Dear Garry,

Proposed V8 Car Race.

I seek your own, and the mayor's assistance please. I am being contacted by an ever increasing number of Wellingtonians who seem to have the perception that council's (so-called) consultation process is totally flawed, - to say the least.

Council's reputation is under question, and this includes so-called consultation on the Waterfront, and other such projects.

My problem, as an elected member accountable to the ratepayers, is how to answer them. I will not compromise my own credibility.

I believe that until this whole matter has been satisfactorily cleared up, all (so-called) public consultation on the V8 Race should be suspended, and the public be immediately informed. The alternative could be an Auditor General's enquiry, and/or a Legal Review.

What is the mayor's position on the Car Race? It seems she is doing her utmost to promote it. This is certainly the impression given by her utterances in the media, during council meetings, and again tonight on TV.

What is her exact position on the race? A clear answer please.

I suggest that council keeps a very careful record of all media, TV and other public statements on the issue. This could be vital later on, and, as we all know, some people have varying recollections of past events.

The public are worried, (and so am I), as to why the council commissioned a professional and very expensive telephone survey of Wellingtonians, where totally incorrect and misleading information was given to those whose views were being sought by the polling company when seeking answers relating to the race.

For example, why were the pollsters told to "Read slowly and clearly, repeat if necessary" and say the following "........... It is anticipated that $1,000,000 could be required annually from the Council, which would result in a very small yet to be determined increase in rates".

Etc, etc, etc. I am not sure of the date of the poll. Yet page 2 of Council Report 3, (1215/11/IM) dated 15 March 2005, and presented to full Council on that day clearly shows the following:-

A Capex amount of $6,158,000 would be required for the year 2005/06, and a net Opex would be required amounting to $2,580,000 for year 2005/06, $2,583,000 for year 2006/07, $2,633,000 for year 2007/08, $2,580,000 for year 2008/09, $2,523,000 for year 2009/10, 2,463,000 for year 2010/11, and $2,398,000 for year 2011/12.

Hardly $1,000,000 annually! What conclusions are the public (and myself) expected to draw from these figures? - other to accept them as stated. Why weren't the public told this at the time? I trust you will provide us ll with a credible explanation to convince otherwise those members of the public who currently believe that this was a deliberate attempt to mislead the public into supporting the race. Not only were these totally incorrect figures given, but the results of the poll based on these figures were then widely publicised as showing public support for the race.

I would add that a reason given to me for misinforming the public of the true figures was that they were not known at the time! If so, why was the poll not delayed until the true picture was known, or why weren't those people questioned so informed? Everyone connected with this Race are well aware I have consistently said there was, in my opinion, an 'indecent haste' in dealing with this vast amount of public funds. Why?

Incidentally: exactly who authorised the poll, and the questions, and the subsequent publicity, knowing it was totally based on what the public now perceive to be completely incorrect and misleading information? As far as I personally am concerned, obviously I am (currently) hesitant to accept the public perception that this Council would seek to deliberately mislead them, so I trust you will give us all a full and credible explanation without further delay.

You suggested that I speak to McDermott Miller about this issue, and I have decided not to. I want this matter dealt with in writing. I seek your confirmation that this and all other relevant correspondence be immediately communicated to the Race Promoters.

Yours sincerely, Jack Ruben.

P.S. What makes this so much more serious is that Council seems unable to find a few thousand dollars for worthwhile projects, but can find many millions for a 3-day event - requiring a further rates increase!

P.P.S. I am ambivalent about the V8 Race, but let those promoting it form a consortium (as was done for the Tiger Woods Golf Tournament), fund it themselves, and keep the profits - if any - not seek public money as with the T.W. Golf

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>

ALSO:

Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election