Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Pilots Welcome Court Ruling On CAA’s ‘Unlawful’ Trawls

14 June 2011

New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Association (NZALPA)

Pilots Welcome Court Ruling On CAA’s ‘Unlawful’ Trawls of Pilot Info

The Airline Pilots’ Association is welcoming a High Court ruling that the Civil Aviation Authority’s random trawls through Pilot information held by the Ministry of Justice were unlawful and must stop.

The Association was forced to go to the High Court last month to challenge the legality of the what the CAA called “the random sampling of conviction history information” after the Authority accessed, reviewed and stored criminal record information held on pilots by the Ministry of Justice.

The Pilots’ action was taken in a bid to stop the CAA going ahead with a second trawl after the CAA refused advice from the Association and the Ministry of Justice that Pilots should be told if their records were being looked at.

The NZALPA President, Glen Kenny said the High Court decision gives strong guidance to the CAA Director on the power he has to lawfully seek records from other agencies.

He says the Court ruling is a solid win for Pilots in the protection of their statutory rights, but it’s disappointing that they had to go to Court in the first place when there were lawful alternatives available to the CAA.

Mr Kenny says the Court decision supported NZALPA’s decision to challenge the CAA on behalf of its members. “Our members have no issue with disclosing relevant convictions to the CAA and they are already required to do that. It was the random sampling without just cause used by the CAA in obtaining the information, which our members should not have been subjected to.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

In his ruling yesterday, the Judge noted the CAA’s method was illegal and went further by noting that the information sought was far beyond what was necessary for the CAA to be able to decide if a Pilot was a “fit and proper person” to hold their licence. The Court ruled that any information obtained should be information “relevant” to making a fit and proper person assessment, not convictions for minor offences or those not relevant to holding a pilots licence.

Mr Kenny said NZALPA members have an inherent interest in aviation safety and want to work with the CAA to ensure the highest standards of safety for the flying public. But, he says that being subjected to an unlawful process which breached members rights has damaged that relationship. “We look forward to engaging with the CAA in the future to see if we can find a way that will allow CAA to have confidence in the robustness of its process that can be achieved in a lawful manner.”

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.