Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 


Partial “No-Rebuild” Talk by CERA Shows Conflicted Thinking

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Partial “No-Rebuild” Talk by CERA Shows Conflicted Policy Thinking

Christchurch – In its latest briefing the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority again demonstrated conflicted policy thinking. It said it would rule out land repair in some red-zoned areas, while leaving open possibilities of remediation in other parts.

In making decisions such as land remediation Cera appears to have stepped over the bounds of a government agency and into the role of an insurance company and a land owner.

Is Cera acting as: (1) an independent government agency that is concerned about the physical safety of residents by making decisions on land zoning and land remediation, or as (2) an extension of the state-owned insurance company EQC by making such decisions for the economic interests of EQC?

The ‘partial no-rebuild’ talk by Cera clearly shows it is not solely concerned about safety. It admits that all land can be remediated at time and cost. Time and cost, are the concerns of the land owner and the insurers, including EQC.

If Cera is acting as an independent government agency, why does it not allow red-zoned homeowners to take their insurance money and then pay them market price to buy these red-zoned homes? Why the insistence on surrendering insurance policies to the crown?

It seems Cera is sending mixed messages.

On the one hand Cera tells residents to weigh their decisions based on insurance payout comparisons, and most importantly, not to make a rush decision.

On the other hand Cera would like people to believe its current buy-out offers are the best option. The language in the offers mildly threatens residents with lower prices for their red-zoned homes should they give the offer a pass.

What’s missing in this first part is that Cera omitted telling residents that they are also legally entitled to receive a land damage assessment from the other insurer, EQC, before making any decision.

EQC is obligated to provide assessments on land damage to a policy holder, but for many residents this has not happened.

Any homeowner who signed the Cera buy-out offer without first having an EQC land damage dollar value assessment made a blind decision and may be said to have made their decision to sell under duress, which would invalidate the sale.


ENDS

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Budget 2012: Prescription Charges Help Fund Health
Health Minister Tony Ryall has announced the Government will increase the $3 prescription charge to $5 per item up to a maximum of 20 items from 1 January 2013. The savings will be reinvested in the health sector. More >>
Also:

Court of Appeal: Govt Should Pay Family Caregivers

The victory in the Court of Appeal for families caring for disabled family members should be taken notice of by the Government says Green MP Catherine DelahuntyMore >>

ALSO:

Budget 2012: Education – Larger Classes For More Money
I’m here today to talk about our education plan. Education is a subject that’s dear to my heart and head - and indeed yours, as future employers and business associates of the generation of young New Zealanders who are coming through our education system ... More >>

ALSO:


Industrial Relations: New Laws Proposed
Labour Minister Kate Wilkinson has announced a package of measures that will extend workers’ rights to request flexible working hours and ensure a fair and flexible collective bargaining environment. More >>

ALSO:

Christchurch: A State of Discontent
Jane Bowron, the Christchurch journalist who came to national prominence through her first-hand accounts of living through the earthquake and its aftermath, says dissatisfaction with the mayor and council is growing, and protests are likely to ... More >>

ALSO:

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
Regional
Search Scoop  
 
 
powered by newsagent
NZ independent news