Not too late to sign up for ShakeOut

21 September 2012

With less than a week to go, more than 37,000 Hamilton residents have signed up for ShakeOut, the biggest earthquake drill in New Zealand’s history.

ShakeOut happens on Wednesday, 26 September, at 9.26am, and lasts just one minute. The exercise aims to make New Zealanders aware of the “Drop, Cover, Hold” approach to an earthquake – drop to the ground, take cover under a table or desk, and hold the position until the tremors stop.

Councillor Pippa Mahood, Hamilton City Council’s Civil Defence representative, says it’s not too late for Hamiltonians to be part of ShakeOut.

“Registration for ShakeOut can be done online, at www.shakeout.govt.nz – it takes only a couple of minutes,” says Cr Mahood. “More than 1.1 million New Zealanders have already signed up, but we want to grow the number of participants over the next few days.”

Cr Mahood says many of the city’s schools are already signed up, and businesses can really benefit from participating in ShakeOut: “The Canterbury experience has shown getting businesses up and running is absolutely crucial to recovery from an earthquake, so we want our local companies to get involved – it’s only one minute in the working day, and ‘Drop, Cover, Hold’ could save staff members’ lives if an earthquake hits.”

For more information on ShakeOut, visit www.shakeout.govt.nz, www.gethru.govt.nz, or follow ShakeOut on Facebook (NZ Get Thru) and Twitter (@NZGetThru).

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Arguably Reassuring: Inspector-General Finds GCSB "Arguably" Legal

Of the 88 individuals:

• 15 cases involving 22 individuals did not have any information intercepted by GCSB.

• another four cases involving five individuals were the subjects of a New Zealand Security Intelligence Service warrant and the GCSB assisted in the execution of the warrants. The Inspector-General is of the view that there were arguably no breaches and the law is unclear.

• the Bureau only provided technical assistance which did not involve interception of communications, involving three of the individuals, so no breach occurred.

• the remaining cases involved the collection of metadata, and the Inspector-General formed the view that there had arguably been no breach, noting once again that the law is unclear.
More>>