NZ cities among best in worldwide Quality of Living rankings
New Zealand cities among world’s best in
Mercer’s 2012 worldwide Quality of Living
04 December 2012
• • Auckland ranks third in the
global list of 221 cities with Wellington 13th
• • Vienna remains at the top, Baghdad at the bottom
• • Singapore ranks highest in new 2012 global ranking of cities with the best infrastructure
Major cities in New Zealand continue to offer overseas expatriates world-class living standards and working conditions, Mercer’s 2012 Quality of Living Survey has found. Auckland has maintained its position, for the fourth year in a row, as the third best city in the global rankings, followed by Wellington at 13th place.
Across the Tasman, Sydney has ranked as the tenth best city in the world, moving up one place from 2011, while Melbourne and Perth follow closely at 17 and 21 respectively. Canberra maintained its 26th position, followed by Adelaide (29) and Brisbane (37).
Mercer’s Quality of Living index list covers 221
cities, ranked against New York as the base city.
The survey is conducted annually to help multinational companies and other organisations compensate employees fairly when placing them on international assignments.
Martin Lewington, Head of Mercer in New Zealand, says multinational organisations rely on the annual report to protect the well-being and security of employees placed overseas.
“The survey provides global employers with the knowledge to select and promote specific locations to potential expats. New Zealand continues to present itself as an attractive destination for skilled workers due to our world class schooling, public services and high living standards,” Mr Lewington said.
Mercer’s global survey is based on an evaluation of 39 criteria for each city, grouped in ten categories, including political and socio-economic environment, medical and health considerations, education, transport and housing. Considerations such as housing and accessibility are all monitored and scored in relation to their potential as international destinations for employees of global organisations.
This year’s ranking separately identifies the cities with the best infrastructure based on electricity supply, water availability, telephone and mail services, public transportation, traffic congestion and the range of international flights from local airports. Auckland ranked at 43rd place, followed by Wellington at 48.
Mr Lewington believes New Zealand is in a strong regional position for global companies looking at overseas projects, and for skilled workers seeking new employment opportunities overseas.
“The consistently high quality of living ranking of our cities ensures New Zealand continues to offer multi-national organisations an appealing destination to set up a regional hub into new Asian markets. While our market continues to face skills shortages in some industries, local employers should promote the benefits of living in the region when undertaking international recruitment, to help attract much-needed talent,” Mr Lewington said.
Vienna retains the top spot as the city with the world’s best quality of living, according to the Mercer 2012 Quality of Living Survey. Zurich and Auckland follow in second and third place, respectively, and Munich is in fourth place, followed by Vancouver, which ranked fifth. Düsseldorf dropped one spot to rank sixth followed by Frankfurt in seventh, Geneva in eighth, Copenhagen in ninth, and Bern and Sydney tied for tenth place.
Globally, the cities with the lowest
quality of living are Khartoum, Sudan (217); N’Djamena,
Chad (218); Port-au-Prince, Haiti (219); and Bangui, Central
African Republic (220). Baghdad, Iraq (221) ranks
For city infrastructure Singapore is at the top of this index, followed by Frankfurt and Munich in second place. Copenhagen (4) and Dusseldorf (5) fill the next two slots, while Hong Kong and London share sixth place. Port-au-Prince (221) ranks at the bottom of the list.
“In order for multinational companies to ensure their expatriates are compensated appropriately and an adequate hardship allowance is included in compensation packages, they must be aware of current events and local circumstances,” said Slagin Parakatil, Senior Researcher at Mercer. “Factors such as internal stability, law enforcement effectiveness, crime levels and medical facilities are important to consider when deciding on an international assignment, and the impact on daily life that could be encountered by the expatriate in overseas placements.”
Mr Parakatil continued: “Infrastructure has a significant effect on the quality of living that expatriates experience. While often taken for granted when functioning to a high standard, a city’s infrastructure can generate severe hardship when it is deficient. Companies need to provide adequate allowances to compensate their international workers for these and other hardships.”
Singapore remains the highest-ranking Asian city at 25 followed by Japanese cities Tokyo (44), Kobe (48), Yokohama (49) and Osaka (57). Hong Kong (70), Seoul (75), Kuala Lumpur (80), Taipei (85) and Shanghai (95) are other major Asian cities ranked in the top 100. The region’s lowest-ranking cities are Dhaka, Bangladesh (203); Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan (204); and Dushanbe, Tajikistan (207).
For city infrastructure, Singapore has the highest ranking worldwide followed by Hong Kong (6), Tokyo (32). Nagoya (41), Kobe (44), Seoul (50) and Osaka (51) are the next highest-ranking cities in this region. The region’s lowest-ranking city for city infrastructure is Dhaka, Bangladesh (205).
noticeable gap can be seen among Asia Pacific cities where
several cities have improved in the region partly because
they have been investing massively in infrastructure and
public services,” said Mr. Parakatil. Competition among
municipalities has been continuously increasing in order to
attract multinationals, foreigners, expatriates and
tourists. Yet a considerable number of Asian cities rank in
the bottom quartile, mainly due to high political
volatility, poor infrastructure and obsolete public
Canadian cities still dominate the top of the index for this region, with Vancouver (5) retaining the top regional spot, followed by Ottawa (14), Toronto (15) and Montreal (23). Calgary ranks 32 on the overall quality of living ranking. Overall, there was almost no movement in rankings among Canadian cities from 2011 to 2012, with Calgary advancing one position, Montreal retreating one position, and the other cities remaining unchanged.
Honolulu (28) is the city in the United States with the highest quality of living, followed by San Francisco (29) and Boston (35). Chicago is at 42 and Washington, DC ranks 43. New York – the base city – ranks 44. In Central and South America, Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe ranks the highest for quality of living at 63. San Juan, Puerto Rico follows at 72 and Montevideo, Uruguay at 77. Port-au-Prince, Haiti (219) ranks lowest in the region.
Mr Parakatil said: “Overall, there has been little change in the rankings for North American cities. A number of South and Central American countries have experienced positive change, essentially due to some modest infrastructural and recreational improvement. Nevertheless, political and security issues, along with natural disasters, continue to hamper the quality of living in South and Central American cities. High crime levels also remain a major problem.”
In terms of city
infrastructure, Vancouver (9) tops the ranking for the
region with Atlanta and Montreal following at 13. Other
Canadian cities that ranked highly were Toronto (16) and
Ottawa (25). In the United States, Dallas ranked 15,
followed by Washington, DC (22), Chicago (28) and New York
(30). Buenos Aires, Argentina (83) has the best city
infrastructure in Central and South America, whereas
Port-au-Prince is the lowest ranking at 221.
Europe has 15 cities among the world’s top 25 cities for quality of living. Vienna retains the highest-ranking for both the region and globally. The rest of the top 10 for Europe are dominated by German and Swiss cities, with three cities each in the top 10. Zurich (2) is followed by Munich (4), Düsseldorf (6), Frankfurt (7), Geneva (8), Copenhagen (9) and Bern (10). The lowest-ranking Western European cities are Athens (83) and Belfast (64).
Other European cities among the top 25 include Amsterdam (12), Berlin (16), Hamburg (17), Luxembourg (19), Stockholm (19), Brussels (22) Nürnberg (24) and Stuttgart (27). Paris ranks 29 and is followed by Helsinki (32), Oslo (32) and London (38). Dublin dropped nine places from last year to rank 35, mostly due to a combination of serious flooding and an increase in crime rates. Lisbon ranks 44 followed by Madrid (49) and Rome (52). Prague, Czech Republic (69) is the highest-ranking Eastern European city followed by Budapest, Hungary (74); Ljubljana, Slovenia (75); Vilnius, Lithuania (79); and Warsaw, Poland (84). The lowest-ranking European city is Tbilisi, Georgia (213).
Overall, European cities continue to have high quality of living as a result of a combination of increased stability, rising living standards and advanced city infrastructures,” said Mr. Parakatil. “But economic turmoil, political tension and high unemployment in some European countries and high levels of unemployment have continued to be problematic in the region.”
With six cities in the top 10, European cities also fare well in the city infrastructure ranking. Frankfurt and Munich rank the highest at second place, followed by Copenhagen (4) and Düsseldorf (5). London (6) and Hamburg (9) are followed by Paris which ranks 12. Budapest (67) is the highest-ranking for city infrastructure in Eastern Europe followed by Vilnius (74) and Prague (75), whereas Yerevan (189) and Tbilisi (201) rank lowest.
“Infrastructure in German and Danish cities is among
the best in the world, in part due to their first-class
airport facilities, international and local connectivity,
and a high standard of public services,” said Mr
Parakatil. “London’s high ranking in the infrastructure
index reflects a combination of high level of public
services offered, with its extensive public transportation
system including airports, the London Underground buses and
Middle East and Africa
Dubai (73) and Abu Dhabi (78) in the United Arab Emirates are the region’s cities with the best quality of living. Port Louis in Mauritius (82), Cape Town (89) and Johannesburg (94) follow, and along with Victoria in the Seychelles (96) and Tel Aviv (99), are the region’s only other cities in the top 100. This region has 15 cities in the bottom 20, including Lagos, Nigeria (202); Bamako, Mali (209); Khartoum, Sudan (217); and N’Djamena, Chad (218). Baghdad, Iraq (221) is the lowest-ranking city both regionally and globally.
In the city infrastructure index, most of the region’s cities rank below 100. The exceptions are Dubai (34), which ranks the highest in the region for city infrastructure, Tel Aviv (58), Abu Dhabi (72), Port Louis (91), Muscat (94), Cairo (95) and Cape Town (97). Port Louis, Cairo and Cape Town are the only African cities in the top 100. Elsewhere in the region, Doha, Qatar is at 102, Tunis, Tunisia, ranks 103 and Manama, Bahrain is at 110. In terms of city infrastructure, Baghdad, Iraq (220) is the lowest-ranking city regionally, along with Sana’a, Yemen (219); Brazzaville, Congo (218); Kigali, Rwanda (217); and Abuja, Nigeria (215).
“The ongoing turmoil in many countries across North Africa and the Middle East has led to serious security issues for locals and expatriates,” said Mr. Parakatil. “Many countries continue to experience violence through political demonstrations that have sometimes developed into massive uprisings and led to serious instability within the region. Countries such as Syria and Mali have seen their quality of living levels drop substantially. Employers should continually monitor the situation in these countries, as circumstances can degrade rapidly. Companies need to be able to proactively implement mitigation plans, such as emergency repatriation, or adjust expatriate compensation packages accordingly.”