Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 


Last Gulp for Hamilton Fluoride


Last Gulp for Hamilton Fluoride

BY GEOFFREY ROBINSON and REIHANA ROBINSON

As its tribunal date fast approaches, Hamilton City Council faces little choice but to turn off the tap and end its controversial practice of drinking water fluoridation once and for all.

With public opinion tilting heavily against addition of chemical fluoride (hydrofluorosilicic acid) to city water, mounting concerns in the scientific and medical communities, and serious ethical questions, there is scant justification left for Hamilton to continue forced mass medication of the city’s population.

In response to its recent month-long campaign for public input, the tribunal received an unprecedented 1,560 submissions. Of those, 1,386 (89 per cent) oppose fluoridation – an overwhelming majority that erases all doubt as to where residents stand.

An examination of submissions reveals broad opposition, ranging from ordinary householders and parents to those identified with dental and orthodontic practices, the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, NZ Health Trust, NZ Journal of Natural Medicine, naturopathic and general health practices, and organisations from Grey Power and Soil and Health to the Waikato Clinical School.

The submissions against Hamilton’s fluoride practice number more than ten times those received during the annual plan process only two years ago. Opposition has clearly grown. Approximately 150 submitters have asked to address the tribunal, stretching the hearings to four days.

The Waikato District Health Board is required to support the pro-fluoridation policy of the Ministry of Health and, consequently, Hamilton’s 47-year-old fluoridation habit. Of the minority of submitters supporting fluoridation, many are associated with the DHB itself or MOH.

Just prior to HCC’s call for public submissions, the Waikato DHB ratcheted up its political lobbying efforts behind the scenes, with a troubling and professionally unusual medical “Grand Rounds” presentation on the subject of drinking water fluoridation. In the world of medical education, grand rounds are a form of ongoing education for practitioners, commonly in lecture and question format. Generally reflecting the highest of academic standards and welcoming of both professionals and all interested lay people, grand rounds are an academic forum reflecting the best tradition of broadening knowledge, learning and understanding. The Robinsons, as a matter of personal interest, have attended grand rounds at one well-known North American medical school.

But the late February Waikato DHB grand rounds “lecture”, presented by medical officer of heath Felicity Dumble and principle dental officer and Hamilton dentist Rob Aitken, was something different. Startling some in attendance, the presenters opened with instructions that anyone associated with any media -- newspaper, radio or other public information outlet -- was required to leave the room immediately. Unlike proper grand rounds, attendees were told the event was “a private meeting”.

One highly qualified health professional characterised the day’s intro as “like a fascist lock down”. What followed was reportedly less academic than expected and more a political effort to bolster support for fluoridation among local medical and health professionals. The speakers reportedly presented sketchy and incomplete data promoting fluoridation and ridiculed scientific evidence associating fluoridation with disorders from osteoporosis and vascular disease to impaired foetal development and lowered cognitive function.

A question from another physician in attendance requesting peer-reviewed studies that support the DHB stance was brushed aside. The audience instead heard a plea for continued fluoridation of drinking water.

The Waikato District Health Board will be the main “group presenter” supporting fluoridation at HCC’s climactic tribunal.

Three HCC councillors -- Pippa Mahood, Martin Gallagher, and Ewan Wilson – are elected members of the Waikato DHB. The three also sit on the DHB Community and Public Health Advisory Committee, which advises the full board on policies like fluoridation in Hamilton. By virtue of their DHB jobs, the three have obvious, major conflicts of interest in respect of the HCC fluoride tribunal.

Were Mahood, Wilson, or Gallagher to participate, it would be like serving on a jury where the chief prosecutor is one’s brother-in-law. They should step down or be excused by tribunal chairman Mayor Julie Hardaker.

Other councillors, like former DHB member and deputy mayor Gordon Chesterman, may have opinions on fluoridation going into the tribunal. But that is realistically to be expected and, after all, someone has to decide.

As for its decision, HCC has no legal mandate to medicate the general population, and the purported benefits of drinking water fluoridation are far from proven and widely debated at best. Health risks cannot be discounted. Safety cannot be guaranteed. Councillors are not medical practitioners. Forced medication is unethical. There are inexpensive and readily available alternatives. The public rejects fluoridation by a wide margin.

There is no other choice. Hamilton fluoridation has to end.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regional
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news