Press Release
ISSUED BY AFFORDABLE AUCKLAND
Property Rights

Property Abuse by Local Politicians Endemic

“Manukau ward councillor Arthur Anae’s failure to obtain permission from a property owner before affixing a campaign sign to the fence is symptomatic of a criminal disregard for private property rights held by most local body politicians,” says Affordable Auckland Mayoral candidate Stephen Berry.

“As is typical of Auckland councillors’ with parliamentary sized egos, Mr. Anae appears unconcerned about any impact upon the property owner’s fence, claiming the screws won’t leave any damage.” Owner of the fence Tim Huston believes otherwise saying “there is definitely going to be some holes in there.”

Mayoral candidate Berry says that while most local body politicians would never be so rude as to screw their election signs into a private fence without permission, they will happily disrespect private property rights in other ways. “Local body politicians of virtually all political stripes campaign on the idea that local government should dictate land use to private property owners and if you’ve got a problem with that, be prepared to shell out thousands for permission to do otherwise.”

Mr. Berry says there are many examples across the region of politicians exhibiting total disrespect for private property rights. “Just last weekend at Franklin candidate Niko Kloeten’s launch I spoke to farm owners who have spent years battling council for the right to subdivide their properties. In my ward of Waitemata & Gulf I’ve been approached by a café owner who didn’t have a sink within the requisite number of centimetres from a food preparation area.”

“While candidates from the left will seek to centrally plan your property one way and candidates from the right will seek to centrally plan your property another way, Affordable Auckland says that what happens on your property should be done your way!”

Stephen Berry is also standing for Council in Waitemata & Gulf and for the Waitemata Local Board.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell:
On Putting Profit Potential Ahead Of Human Potential

Does New Zealand – despite our claims to egalitarianism and everyone being equal before the law – treat the people engaged in tax evasion more leniently than the people who commit welfare fraud? Yes, we do.

Earlier research by Victoria University associate professor Lisa Marriott has shown that while both offences are of the same kind (financial crimes) and have the same victim (the government, and society) the two get treated very differently from a prosecution point of view...

This week, Marriott released the next stage of her research findings, which are entirely consistent with what went before. Apparently, the government agencies involved also treat tax offenders more leniently than they treat welfare offenders. More>>