Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 


Formal review of Christchurch City Council Insurance

Media Advisory 24 September 2013

From: Cr. Helen Broughton, Chair of the Corporate and Financial Committee, Christchurch City Council

Subject: Formal review of Christchurch City Council Insurance


The Christchurch City Council is undertaking a formal review of a number of issues relating to the Councils insurance by an independent barrister QC.

The review follows a decision ratified by the Council on the 25 July that was publicly excluded. However, at a subsequent meeting of the Corporate and Financial Committee, I successfully moved that the decision regarding this review should be taken out of Public excluded.

The decision being announced today was delayed until matters concerning the CEO future were resolved.

Background

For some time I have been one of five Councillors (Cr’s Tim Carter, Glenn Livingstone, Yani Johanson and Jimmy Chen) concerned about a number of issues with respect to the Council’s insurance.

Regrettably, a number of our colleagues had previously believed that there was no basis for these concerns, which delayed advancing this review. However, as more information became available it was clear that they better understood why a review was required.

In announcing this review, I would also like to acknowledge the concerns previously expressed (June 2012) by Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce chief executive Peter Townsend, about the low insurance valuations of some quake-hit council facilities. I note that at that time, Mr Townsend said the council needed to investigate these issues further.

I also believe that when considering why this review is important, one must also consider the report following the: “Inquiry (19 April 2012) into how Christchurch City Council managed conflicts of interest when it made decisions about insurance cover.” http://www.oag.govt.nz/2012/christchurch-city-council-inquiry

Focus of insurance review

There are three areas of concern;

1. The appropriateness of the placement of the Council’s insurance with Civic in 2009 and the consequent placement with LAPP in 2010.

*The Council moved in 2009 from NZI to Civic at the firm direction of “executive management”

o It has been public record that the movement from Civic to Lapp 2010 was outside delegated authority. The GM Finance signed off on this transfer alone, when the delegated authority is for the GM Finance and the CEO. [ The CEO could not do this as he was on Civic}- However in this situation the signoff should have come to Council.

o Civic is largely dependent on reinsurance monies.

2. A detailed assessment of the strength of Council’s contractual position with Civic.

3. A review of the two contracts referred to by Judge McKenzie in his judgement in the Civic versus R and V Versicherung of 9 April.

There are two contracts- the original dated June 2010 and a replacement policy dated 20 September 2012. To quote directly from Justice McKenzie:

“The replacement policy asserts there were errors in the original contract. There must be a proper and full enquiry into whether that is so. The reinsurer’s liability depends on the interpretation of the original contract not the replacement contract.”

The Judge also refers to complexity with respects to the relationship between Civic and Lapp and contractual issues raised from this.

Why is this review important?

The role of this review is to ensure that we understand:

1. where and why mistakes were made;

2. what are the implications to the council and its ratepayers; and

3. what changes need to be made to ensure that we don’t make the same mistakes again?

Normally insurance contracts with reinsurer’s mirror the contract between the contract between insurer and entity {CCC} .We need to establish if this was the case In Christchurch’s contract.

The Corporate and Financial Services Committee will receive an initial report by the end of the month. At that time, the committee will need to determine if the scope needs to be widened and whether central government needs to be involved.

In announcing this review, I will be writing to the Minister of Local Government and the Minister of Earth Quake Recovery to brief them on this matter.


ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

More Evidence - Scoop Press Conference Recordings:
PM's Post-Cab Presser 8/8/11
"at that point [Tucker] told me he'd release it ..."

Hager Revelations: Inquiry Into NZSIS Release Of Goff Docs

The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS), Cheryl Gwyn, announced she would be instituting an inquiry concerning allegations that the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) might have released official information to Mr Cameron Slater, regarding briefings provided to the then Leader of the Opposition, for political purposes...

“I am satisfied there is a sufficient public interest justifying the commencement of an own-motion inquiry into the substance of the issues raised with my Office,” said Ms Gwyn. More>>

Goff: Director’s Letter Contradicts Key’s Claims

At yesterday’s media standup, when asked on the topic John Key said ‘I wasn’t told’...
“In a letter dated November 2011 former SIS director Warren Tucker states three times that ‘in accordance with the usual practice of keeping the minister informed’ the Prime Minister had been told. More>>


 

Parliament Today:

Schools, PPTA Sign Up: Primary Teachers And Principals Vote Down Govt Plan

Teachers and principals have voted overwhelmingly against the Government’s controversial “Investing in Educational Success” policy, including proposed highly-paid principal and teacher roles. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Usual Round Of Mud Slinging And Name-Calling

This week gave an interesting example of how hard it is to untangle the reality from the slanging matches. The issue that emerged early this week could hardly be more important. Does the government intend to cut spending in health, education and on the environment if re-elected, or not? More>>

Earlier:

Electionresults.co.nz: National and NZ First Rise in Roy Morgan Poll

National has bounced back in the latest Roy Morgan Poll but the big winner has been New Zealand First who rise to their highest level of support since September 2013. More>>

ALSO:

Fish Pun Warning: By Hoki! It’s Labour’s Fisheries Policy

A Labour Government will protect the iconic Kiwi tradition of fishing by improving access to the coast, protecting the rights of recreational fishers and reviewing snapper restrictions, Labour’s Fisheries spokesperson Damien O’Connor says. More>>

ALSO:

It's Official: Governor General Gives Direction To Conduct Election

The Governor General has signed the writ directing the Electoral Commission to conduct the General Election on 20 September 2014. This is the formal authority to run the 2014 election, and enables candidate nominations to open tomorrow Thursday 21 August 2014. More>>

Gordon Campbell: No More Mr Nice Guy

When future historians seek to identify the exact moment when the prime ministerial career of John Key hit the downward slope, they may well point to Key’s interview yesterday with Guyon Espiner on RNZ’s Morning Report. More>>

ALSO:

Dirty (Politics) Weekend: Collins’ Admission Reason For Key To Act

"Despite claiming that the evidence about her in Nicky Hager's book was ‘false’ Judith Collins has now been forced to admit that she did send information about a Ministerial Services staff member to Cameron Slater for him to use in a baseless smear campaign. More>>

ALSO:

Potential Disasters: Underground Coal Fire On Denniston Plateau

Forest & Bird says one or more coal fires have broken out beneath the Denniston Plateau, and that the Department of Conservation (DOC) must stop Bathurst Resources’ preparatory mining work going on there until the fire or fires are extinguished. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regional
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news