Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 


Formal review of Christchurch City Council Insurance

Media Advisory 24 September 2013

From: Cr. Helen Broughton, Chair of the Corporate and Financial Committee, Christchurch City Council

Subject: Formal review of Christchurch City Council Insurance


The Christchurch City Council is undertaking a formal review of a number of issues relating to the Councils insurance by an independent barrister QC.

The review follows a decision ratified by the Council on the 25 July that was publicly excluded. However, at a subsequent meeting of the Corporate and Financial Committee, I successfully moved that the decision regarding this review should be taken out of Public excluded.

The decision being announced today was delayed until matters concerning the CEO future were resolved.

Background

For some time I have been one of five Councillors (Cr’s Tim Carter, Glenn Livingstone, Yani Johanson and Jimmy Chen) concerned about a number of issues with respect to the Council’s insurance.

Regrettably, a number of our colleagues had previously believed that there was no basis for these concerns, which delayed advancing this review. However, as more information became available it was clear that they better understood why a review was required.

In announcing this review, I would also like to acknowledge the concerns previously expressed (June 2012) by Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce chief executive Peter Townsend, about the low insurance valuations of some quake-hit council facilities. I note that at that time, Mr Townsend said the council needed to investigate these issues further.

I also believe that when considering why this review is important, one must also consider the report following the: “Inquiry (19 April 2012) into how Christchurch City Council managed conflicts of interest when it made decisions about insurance cover.” http://www.oag.govt.nz/2012/christchurch-city-council-inquiry

Focus of insurance review

There are three areas of concern;

1. The appropriateness of the placement of the Council’s insurance with Civic in 2009 and the consequent placement with LAPP in 2010.

*The Council moved in 2009 from NZI to Civic at the firm direction of “executive management”

o It has been public record that the movement from Civic to Lapp 2010 was outside delegated authority. The GM Finance signed off on this transfer alone, when the delegated authority is for the GM Finance and the CEO. [ The CEO could not do this as he was on Civic}- However in this situation the signoff should have come to Council.

o Civic is largely dependent on reinsurance monies.

2. A detailed assessment of the strength of Council’s contractual position with Civic.

3. A review of the two contracts referred to by Judge McKenzie in his judgement in the Civic versus R and V Versicherung of 9 April.

There are two contracts- the original dated June 2010 and a replacement policy dated 20 September 2012. To quote directly from Justice McKenzie:

“The replacement policy asserts there were errors in the original contract. There must be a proper and full enquiry into whether that is so. The reinsurer’s liability depends on the interpretation of the original contract not the replacement contract.”

The Judge also refers to complexity with respects to the relationship between Civic and Lapp and contractual issues raised from this.

Why is this review important?

The role of this review is to ensure that we understand:

1. where and why mistakes were made;

2. what are the implications to the council and its ratepayers; and

3. what changes need to be made to ensure that we don’t make the same mistakes again?

Normally insurance contracts with reinsurer’s mirror the contract between the contract between insurer and entity {CCC} .We need to establish if this was the case In Christchurch’s contract.

The Corporate and Financial Services Committee will receive an initial report by the end of the month. At that time, the committee will need to determine if the scope needs to be widened and whether central government needs to be involved.

In announcing this review, I will be writing to the Minister of Local Government and the Minister of Earth Quake Recovery to brief them on this matter.


ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell:
On The Greens Proposal To Gradually Lift The Minimum Wage

Heading into the election home stretch, voters have a clear choice about the best way to help low and middle income New Zealanders. They can do so by gradually lifting the minimum wage (as the Greens propose) or by a small tax cut, as the government seems about to announce.

The minimum wage boost – by 75 cents an hour to $15 in December, and then by gradual annual increments to $18 an hour by 2017 – that the Greens are talking about is just one part of a packet of employment measures that would include scrapping youth rates and the 90 day trial period, introducing a redundancy package of four weeks, offsetting any abatement effect of the policy package for those receiving Working For Families, and finally… ditching the exception made by the government (during the Hobbit negotiations) for workers in the screen industry, which denies them normal workplace safeguards and entitlements. More>>

 

Parliament Today:

2014 General Election: Voting Period Begins

The first votes for the 2014 general election will be cast today, Wednesday 3 September, as advance voting begins ahead of election day on Saturday 20 September. More>>

ALSO:

Two Dead, One Injured: Suspect Charged After Ashburton Shooting

Russell John Tully has appeared in Christchurch District Court. Tully has been remanded in custody on charges of murder of Peg Noble and Leigh Cleveland and attempted murder of Lindy Curtis. More>>

ALSO:

John Key Press Conference: Ashburton Shootings, Judith Collins Inquiry

Prime Minister John Key has delayed the release of Nationals’ fiscal policy in light of this morning’s shooting at a Work and Income office in Ashburton... Key also answered questions about Judith Collins, and confirmed that independent inquiry will be held with regard to allegations made against Collins. More>>

ALSO:

Internet MANA: Georgina Beyer Rocks The Waka

“There is now, and always will be, a range of views about many issues within our movement and members are free to express them, but Georgina’s views on Kim Dotcom are not shared by the MANA Movement leadership or the vast majority of MANA members and supporters around the country” states MANA Candidate for Waiariki, Annette Sykes. More>>

ALSO:

IGIS Update: Inquiry Into Release Of NZSIS Information

The Inquiry would be conducted in private and individuals would appear before her separately over a period of more than a week. She does not intend to name those summoned to give evidence until her report is published. “I can confirm that all persons summoned will be required to appear under oath...” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell:
On John Key’s ‘Blame It On Judith’ Strategy

Right now, Prime Minister John Key seems intent on limiting the scope of any inquiry into his government’s dealings with Cameron Slater. The declared aim is to make that inquiry solely about Judith Collins’ behavior with respect to the Serious Fraud Office. More>>

ALSO:

Maori Council Lawyers' Statement: Supreme Court Decision On Maori Water Rights

“…the Supreme Court refused to give Pouakani people what they asked for, but may have given them something much, much better instead… the Supreme Court has questioned whether the Crown owns the River at all.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Debate, And The Collins Accusation

Debating is a peculiar discipline in that what you say is less important than how you’re saying it. Looking poised, being articulate and staying on topic generally wins the day – and on that score, Labour leader David Cunliffe won what turned out to be a bruising encounter with Prime Minister John Key last night on TVNZ. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regional
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news