Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 


Council decides against area-wide rockfall mitigation

Thursday 17 July 2014

Council decides against area-wide rockfall mitigation

Councillors today decided area-wide rockfall mitigation for Port Hills homes red-zoned by the Crown was not practical for several reasons, including uncertainty around effectiveness and costs.

Since 2012, Christchurch City Council and the Canterbury Earthquake Authority (CERA) have investigated engineering solutions that would reduce the risk to clusters of Port Hills homes in the path of falling rock. Today, after considering additional reports commissioned in May, Councillors decided not to adopt or further investigate area-wide rockfall mitigation.

Chief Planning Officer Mike Theelen said the Council's investigations had been extensive, thorough and independently peer-reviewed.

"We've carefully considered all the various options, and received sound technical advice and costings for each. Community-based rockfall protection structures are not feasible options, given the cost to build and maintain them, and limits to using red-zoned land now owned by the Crown.

"The Council has a responsibility under the Resource Management Act to reduce exposure to natural hazards, so we have to carefully consider the consequences of a rockfall protection structure failing. As the structures don't remove the hazard posed by rockfall, some risk remains.

"We appreciate this news is unwelcome to some Port Hills residents. We're currently working with several people as they investigate individual rockfall protection structures to reduce the risk for their home, and we're committed to supporting others if they want to look into this option."

Christchurch Mayor Lianne Dalziel said, "I do feel for the people badly affected by rockfall, their dreams have been shattered. Today Councillors expressed their great reluctance before voting against area-wide rockfall mitigation. However, we have to make the hard calls to send a message that we don't accept development in areas where the level of risk is high. The option still exists for the people who remain to pursue individual rockfall protection for their homes."

The Council has worked with CERA to fund red-zoned buyout offers for properties where rockfall presented an unacceptable risk to life.

Background

In December 2013, the Council requested staff urgently identify areas for community-based mitigation of rock roll risk for red zone properties, where it would be cost-effective to do so as compared with the cost of property purchase.

Council staff produced a report detailing these investigations, reporting back to Council in January 2014 and 8 May 2014, and the Council asked for more information on the investigations and costings, including liability if rockfall protection fails in the future.

Following the Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the Council commissioned an independent peer review of its report, conducted by an engineering geologist experienced in the design of rockfall protection structures on the Port Hills. The peer review agreed with Council's methodology, but said the costings were too conservative and that the structures were likely to cost more than estimated.
The issue was discussed again at Council meetings on 12 June and 26 June 2014, before the decision was made today.

- ends -

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regional
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news