Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Council decides against area-wide rockfall mitigation

Thursday 17 July 2014

Council decides against area-wide rockfall mitigation

Councillors today decided area-wide rockfall mitigation for Port Hills homes red-zoned by the Crown was not practical for several reasons, including uncertainty around effectiveness and costs.

Since 2012, Christchurch City Council and the Canterbury Earthquake Authority (CERA) have investigated engineering solutions that would reduce the risk to clusters of Port Hills homes in the path of falling rock. Today, after considering additional reports commissioned in May, Councillors decided not to adopt or further investigate area-wide rockfall mitigation.

Chief Planning Officer Mike Theelen said the Council's investigations had been extensive, thorough and independently peer-reviewed.

"We've carefully considered all the various options, and received sound technical advice and costings for each. Community-based rockfall protection structures are not feasible options, given the cost to build and maintain them, and limits to using red-zoned land now owned by the Crown.

"The Council has a responsibility under the Resource Management Act to reduce exposure to natural hazards, so we have to carefully consider the consequences of a rockfall protection structure failing. As the structures don't remove the hazard posed by rockfall, some risk remains.

"We appreciate this news is unwelcome to some Port Hills residents. We're currently working with several people as they investigate individual rockfall protection structures to reduce the risk for their home, and we're committed to supporting others if they want to look into this option."

Christchurch Mayor Lianne Dalziel said, "I do feel for the people badly affected by rockfall, their dreams have been shattered. Today Councillors expressed their great reluctance before voting against area-wide rockfall mitigation. However, we have to make the hard calls to send a message that we don't accept development in areas where the level of risk is high. The option still exists for the people who remain to pursue individual rockfall protection for their homes."

The Council has worked with CERA to fund red-zoned buyout offers for properties where rockfall presented an unacceptable risk to life.

Background

In December 2013, the Council requested staff urgently identify areas for community-based mitigation of rock roll risk for red zone properties, where it would be cost-effective to do so as compared with the cost of property purchase.

Council staff produced a report detailing these investigations, reporting back to Council in January 2014 and 8 May 2014, and the Council asked for more information on the investigations and costings, including liability if rockfall protection fails in the future.

Following the Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the Council commissioned an independent peer review of its report, conducted by an engineering geologist experienced in the design of rockfall protection structures on the Port Hills. The peer review agreed with Council's methodology, but said the costings were too conservative and that the structures were likely to cost more than estimated.
The issue was discussed again at Council meetings on 12 June and 26 June 2014, before the decision was made today.

- ends -

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Budget

It may seem like Oliver to be so bold as to ask the Finance Minister for more gruel – but what the Dickens, Steven Joyce… is this Budget really as good as it gets?

Supposedly, the public was going to receive significant rewards – an election year lolly scramble no less – for the eight years of belt tightening that they’ve endured, and for the rundown of essential public services.

Well, what Budget 2017 delivered instead in Education and in Health were allocations barely sufficient to maintain the current levels of service delivery More>>

Scoop Full Coverage: of Budget Announcements & Reaction
Latest: Scoop Search

 
 

Auditor-General Stands Down For Investigation: Gordon Campbell On (Not) Taking Responsibility

So Martin Matthews, our current Auditor-General wishes he could have detected “earlier” the fraud that occurred on his watch at the Ministry of Transport. Hmmm. But he could have detected it earlier, surely? That’s the point. More>>

ALSO:

NGOs Pleased: Govt To Halt Collection Of Client Data

Brenda Pilott, the chair of ComVoices and national manager of Social Service Providers Aotearoa, congratulates the government on its decision to call a halt to the collection of individual client data until the concerns of not-for-profit service providers have been worked through. More>>

ALSO:

Gosh: Blasphemy Law Repeal Struck Down

Chris Hipkins, the MP who tabled a Supplementary Order Paper to add our Blasphemy Law to the Statutes Repeal Bill, said this was a "sad day for freedom of speech, tolerance, and leadership". More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Navy’s Dealings With Fat Leonard, And Twin Peaks

At an official level, our “she’ll be right” attitude routinely spills over into a keen resentment of anyone who suggests the outcomes may be less than satisfactory… The Navy has now gone one step beyond. It won’t even ask itself whether it did a good job. More>>

ALSO:

NZDF: Fifth Rotation Of Troops Heads To Iraq

The fifth rotation of New Zealand Defence Force troops left today for a six-month mission training Iraqi soldiers. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Demonising Of Iran

Will New Zealand still be willing to pursue its recent trade overtures to Iran, now that US President Donald Trump has used his speech in Riyadh to single out Iran as the main source of terrorism and instability in the Middle East? More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 

Opening The Election Supporters

 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election
 
 
 
  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog