Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 


Hamilton’s Fluoride Challenge Withdrawn

SWANZ

SAFE WATER ALTERNATIVE NEW ZEALAND (Inc)

MEDIA RELEASE

Wednesday 3 September 2014

For immediate release

Hamilton’s Fluoride Challenge Withdrawn

Safe Water Alternative NZ Inc (SWANZ) has withdrawn its Judicial Review proceedings against the Hamilton City Council.

SWANZ co-ordinator, Trevor Crosbie, says the reason is two-fold, “Firstly, it’s apparent to us that without substantial financial backing from benefactors we unfortunately cannot continue. While we had a good legal case, our resources are limited compared with the deep pockets of the council. We are grateful for the goodwill and generosity of supporters and won’t stop until we achieve our quest for safe unfluoridated water. We need time to explore our options, including the possibility of future proceedings on different grounds. We will not go away.”

“Another factor is the growing number of challenges to fluoridation. We are confident fluoridation will be required to cease sooner rather than later as a result of these actions. With Israel’s decision to prohibit fluoridation effective 26 August 2014, the Republic of Ireland is now the only country with mandatory fluoridation in the world.”

SWANZ, representing over 11,000 Hamilton residents who oppose having Hydrofluorosilicic Acid added to their water, without their informed consent or due consideration of evidence of harm, had filed proceedings against the Council on 28th April 2014. They claimed Hamilton City Council had not carried out a full consultative process when deciding to re-fluoridate the Hamilton water supply. Fluoride was restarted on 3rd July 2014. By that date Hamilton had been un-fluoridated for 378 days, since the Fluoride Tribunal decision in June 2013.

The reasons the Council gave when they stopped fluoridation included -

(a) they did not consider there was compelling evidence of benefit (for caries protection) and

(b) they did consider there was credible evidence of risks of harm

Mr Crosbie is emphatic these reasons still exist. “Unlike the recent (and unbalanced) Gluckman/Skegg report, the Council considered both sides of the scientific evidence and correctly identified that the potential risks outweighed the benefits. It is disappointing they didn’t have the nerve to stick with their decision.”

SWANZ has requested that Council provides Hamiltonians with a choice, and that it supplies them with a public non-fluoridated supply of drinking water using de-ionising technology (at a cost estimated to be in the order of $10,000 to $15,000 to install and up to $3,000 annually to maintain).

“This is a reasonable proposal,” says Mr Crosbie. “While the fluoridation myth persists, a non-fluoridated source of water for those who don’t want it is a fair request. Other councils already provide such a supply. For example, there is a source in Petone for Wellington residents and both Hastings and Palmerston North Councils are currently installing them. The cost to Hamilton ratepayers (Council) would be a small fraction of the legal costs that Council would have incurred if the Judicial Review had proceeded.”

“The issue of adding a waste by-product to community water supplies will continue to be challenged until the practice ends,” Mr Crosbie concluded.

ENDS

ATTACHMENT: SWANZ Open Letter to Hamilton City Council CEO, Mayor and Councillors


2 September 2014


Open Letter to Hamilton City Council CEO, Mayor and Councillors

Safe Water Alternative NZ is requesting, on behalf of over 11,000 Hamilton residents, that Council seriously revisits the provision of some type of outlet for unfluoridated water drinking water - as presented to Council as Option 3 at the 28th Nov 2013 meeting http://www.hamilton.govt.nz/AgendasAndMinutes/ORDINARY%20COUNCIL%20MEETING%2028%20NOVEMBER%202013%20PART%201%20OF%204.pdf

One possibility would be to provide a public unfluoridated supply of drinking water at a location to be determined using deionising technology and estimated to cost in the order of between $10,000 to $15,000 to install and up to $3,000 operational costs per annum.

Council may be interested that Palmerston North City Council is currently planning to install a 20mm ID offtake pipe between their chlorine injection point and their fluoride injection point. This would be extended to the street with a self-shutoff tap and a backflow preventer. They estimate their allocated budget of $15,000 should be sufficient for this.

In Hastings the Council is currently proposing to spend about $28,000 on public unfluoridated water "filling stations" at two bore sites: Eastbourne Street and Frimley Park.

As Hamilton is a much larger community than Hastings, we would expect at least two outlets here, if not four, considering the size of the city.

In light of similar happenings around NZ, we do not consider our request is unreasonable or overly expensive. We would invite Council to allow us to work with them on this.

Yours sincerely


Trevor Crosbie
Spokesperson SWANZ Inc

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell:
On The Team Behind Trump's Throne

Forget the Putin factor. Daily, the team of charlatans, bigots and stunningly ignorant crackpots that Trump is appointing to head key federal agencies is just as alarming. These are positions with vast power and budgetary discretion over policies that stand to affect tens of millions of vulnerable Americans. Sad! More>>

 

Gordon Campbell: On Bill English, Abroad

If David Cameron was the closest thing John Key had to a political mentor, their successors also share a whole lot in common. Theresa May and Bill English were both propelled into the top jobs as the result of unexpected resignations, and without much in the way of credible competition from their colleagues... More>>

ALSO:

Pike River: Labour Bill To Override Safety Act For Mine Entry

“Bill English has been hiding behind the legal excuse that any attempt to re-enter the mine to recover the bodies might place the mine’s owner, Solid Energy Limited, and its directors in breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Populism And Labour 2017

For many people on the centre-left, populism is a dirty word, and a shorthand for the politics of bigotry. In this country, it has tended to be equated with the angry legions of New Zealand First. Who knew they were not just a reactionary spasm, but the wave of the future? More>>

Oxfam: 30% Of NZ Owns Less Wealth Than Our Two Richest Men

The research also reveals that the richest one per cent have 20 per cent of the wealth in New Zealand, while 90 per cent of the population owns less than half of the nation’s wealth. The research forms part of a global report released to coincide with this week’s annual meeting of political and business leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. More>>

ALSO:

Hospitals: Resident Doctors Set To Strike Again

Despite discussions between the DHBs and NZRDA over safer hours for resident doctors progressing during the last week, the strike planned for next week appears set to proceed. More>>

ALSO:

Not So Super Fund: More Burning Ethical Questions For Steven Joyce

Greens: Radio New Zealand reported this morning that the New Zealand Superfund has $77 million invested in 47 coal companies that the Norwegian Government’s Pension Fund – the largest sovereign fund in the world – has blacklisted. More>>

Activism: Greenpeace Intercepts World’s Biggest Seismic Oil Ship

Greenpeace crew have made contact with the world’s biggest seismic oil ship after travelling 50 nautical miles on two rigid-hulled inflatables off the coast of Wairarapa... Greenpeace radioed the master of the Amazon Warrior to deliver an open letter of protest signed by over 60,000 New Zealanders. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: Why Tax Cuts In 2017 Would Be A (Proven) Bad Idea

Ever since the world fell prey to the mullahs of the free market in the 1980s, no amount of real world evidence has managed dispel one key tenet of their economic faith. Namely, the idea that if you cut income taxes and taxes on small business, a wave of individual enterprise and entrepreneurial energy will thus be unleashed, profits will rise and – hey bingo! – the tax cuts will soon be paying for themselves ... More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
More RSS  RSS
 
 
 
Regional
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news