Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Fight to stop proposal to allow “risky” oil and gas testing

Fight to stop proposal to allow “risky” oil and gas testing close to schools and homes

Thursday, June 9: Council chambers in South Taranaki are hearing evidence on the dangers of its “unusually relaxed” Proposed District Plan, which allows for the production of oil and gas within 200-metres of sensitive areas like houses, schools and hospitals.

At the hearing today, expert witnesses are outlining the risks associated with the Proposed District Plan (PDP), saying a buffer zone of just a couple of hundred metres is not enough.

Community group, Taranaki Energy Watch, is leading the PDP case and has brought experts together from across Australia and New Zealand.

Sarah Roberts, the group’s spokesperson, says today’s hearing will have implications for the rest of the country.

“If these rules pass muster in South Taranaki, the Stratford and New Plymouth District Council is poised to roll out similar rules. There’s also a possibility the Minister of the Environment will enact comparable rules nationally,” she says.

Jenny Polich, an international industry explosion expert with over 15 years’ experience in safety and risk management, says South Taranaki’s proposed regulations don’t account for the potential risks associated with oil and gas activities.

“They are unusually relaxed and will not provide adequate protection from a well blow out or an explosion in a production facility,” she says.

"It is surprising for a government body to suggest arbitrary regulations without using international examples of normal practice.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The hearing also heard from Senior Air Quality Specialist, Louise Wickham, who has worked extensively for the Ministry of Health and Ministry for the Environment in New Zealand.

She says that oil and gas activities emit a large number of toxic and carcinogenic pollutants to air.

“In light of the seriousness of the adverse health effects caused by and associated with these pollutants, I recommended sensible separation distances from sensitive areas, such as home, schools, and hospitals,” she says.

“This is important for ‘safeguarding the life supporting capacity of the air’, as required under the RMA, and not currently present in the Proposed District Plan."

There are concerns that the PDP also defers much of the responsibility to manage the health and safety of oil and gas in South Taranaki to Worksafe.

Legal Counsel Ruby Haazen says this simply isn’t acceptable. The RMA clearly states that it’s the territorial authorities’ responsibility to enable the wellbeing, health and safety of people and communities, and must manage the effects of industry such as oil and gas, she says.

“Worksafe will manage the dangers within the site boundary but it is the responsibility of the District and Regional Councils to ensure those living in the area are also sufficiently protected.”

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.