Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Police use of a Taser on a Greymouth man was unjustified

Police use of a Taser on a Greymouth man was unjustified

The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that Police actions breached policy when a sergeant directed a probationary constable to Taser a Greymouth man.

The probationary constable’s use of the Taser to contact stun the man twice was a disproportionate and unjustified use of force.

At about 9pm on 20 June 2015, Greymouth Police were called to a domestic incident between neighbours in Greymouth. A man had come to his neighbour’s house, drunk and armed with a tomahawk. When Police attended, they were told that the man was no longer armed and had gone back home.

Greymouth Police were aware of the man and his mental health issues. Police decided to delay arresting him until the morning when he would have sobered up.

However, Police were called back to the man’s property at midnight. Officers found the man, and his friend, drunk and abusive, sitting in a car. The man was arrested for the tomahawk incident and he and his friend refused to get out of the car.

After a 20 minute struggle, during which pepper spray was appropriately used on the friend, Police managed to handcuff the man and his friend and escort them to a Police van. When the man refused to move his foot from the van cell door, the sergeant directed a probationary constable to contact stun the man twice with a Taser.

“A Taser can only be used on a person who is assaultive”, said Authority Chair, Judge Sir David Carruthers, “as the man was simply using his foot to block a door, he was not assaultive. The Taser should therefore not have been used.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The Authority also found that the sergeant should not have directed the probationary constable to use the Taser in these circumstances. “The junior officer was put in the unenviable position of feeling like refusal was not an option, given the sergeant’s seniority,” said Sir David.

The Authority also determined that the sergeant should have declared that he had instructed the probationary officer to use the Taser and that he incorrectly recorded that the use of Taser complied with Police policy.

Note: A contact stun is the activation of the Taser while the device is directly applied to the body of the subject.

http://img.scoop.co.nz/media/pdfs/1701


ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.