Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Shoe Importer Charged $290,000 Back Duty

Import News from the Importers Institute

13 May 2000 - Shoe Importer Charged $290,000 Back Duty

The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a shoe importer must pay $290,000 in back duty on buying commissions.

Elitunnel Merchanting Ltd distributed Caterpillar shoes in New Zealand. It bought the shoes through an Australian company, Custom Originals, which had a licence for both countries.

Custom Originals charged Elitunnel for the cost of the goods sourced from Asian manufacturers and, separately, for 31% of the cost, described as "styling and buying charges".

Elitunnel's Customs brokers produced only the goods invoice to Customs. Subsequent investigations by Customs revealed that Customs Originals remitted 15% to the world-wide marketing agents of Caterpillar, while keeping the remaining 16% as profit.

Under the Customs Act, royalties and fees paid to third parties must be included in the amount that importers (through their brokers) declare to Customs, unless they are in the nature of "fees paid by a buyer to an agent for the service of representing him overseas in respect of the purchase of the goods".

The issue for the court to decide was whether the fee Elitunnel paid to Custom Originals fell into this category. The importer claimed that Custom Originals was its buying agent.

In its judgment of 12 April the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier High Court ruling. It said, "The only involvement that the importer regularly had with the manufacturers was that some of the stock was shipped directly to it. But, at that Asian end of the transactions, the essential steps of ordering, approvals, manufacture and payments were handled only between Custom Originals and the manufacturer with Wolverine [agent of Caterpillar] providing the required approvals. The importer's only contractual relationship was with Custom Originals. To approach the matter from another angle, there is no basis in the evidence for an argument that the importer could sue the manufacturer if the goods were faulty or that the manufacturer could sue the importer for non payment."

A copy of this judgment (CA305/98) is available for download in tiff format from or by email from the Secretariat.

* * *

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Media Mega Merger: StuffMe Hearing Argues Over Moveable Feast

New Zealand's two largest news publishers are appealing against the Commerce Commission's rejection of the proposal to merge their operations. More>>


Approval: Northern Corridor Decision Released

The approval gives the green light to construction of the last link of Auckland’s Western Ring Route, providing an alternative route from South Auckland to the North Shore. More>>


Crown Accounts: $4.1 Billion Surplus

The New Zealand Government has achieved its third fiscal surplus in a row with the Crown accounts for the year ended 30 June 2017 showing an OBEGAL surplus of $4.1 billion, $2.2 billion stronger than last year, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says. More>>


Mycoplasma Bovis: One New Property Tests Positive

The newly identified property... was already under a Restricted Place notice under the Biosecurity Act. More>>

Accounting Scandal: Suspension Of Fuji Xerox From All-Of-Government Contract

General Manager of New Zealand Government Procurement John Ivil says, “FXNZ has been formally suspended from the Print Technology and Associated Services (PTAS) contract and terminated from the Office Supplies contract.” More>>