Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Fiordland – A Park not a Port

9 April 2001 - Dunedin

MEDIA RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE USE

Fiordland – A Park not a Port

The Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society said today that the Fiords of Fiordland, including Doubtful Sound, deserve to be a marine park, not a Port.

Southland Water Company has applied to Environment Southland to bring a water tanker into Doubtful Sound up to 12 times a year to take freshwater from the Deep Cove tail race.

“Doubtful Sound in the heart of Fiordland is a remote marine area and home to many special plants and animals including black coral and it is not suitable for water tankers” Forest and Bird’s Southern Conservation Officer Sue Maturin said.

Conservationists are dismayed that they have to fight this battle again, as a similar proposal for the same area was turned down by Environment Court turned in 1997.

The Environment Court concluded in 1997 that although the possibility of a tanker foundering or a discharge of ballast water introducing a foreign organism are events of low probability, the consequences of these would have a high impact, which would be incapable of being avoided, remedied or mitigated.

“Forest and Bird considers that this proposal has many of the problems of the previous one. It still poses risks of oil spills and biosecurity risks of introducing unwanted exotic organisms via the ships’ hull or ballast water.”

The number of proposed tanker visits has been reduced from once a week to once a month, however Sue Maturin says the tanker, when ever it is in the fiord, will be visually intrusive and will destroy the sense of remoteness in Doubtful Sound.

“Deep Cove will become known as a place where tankers visit and it will turn Deep Cove into an industrial port” she said.

The Company suggests in its application that they can address the impact of the tankers on the natural character by offering compensation to tour companies for the days the tanker is in Port.

“Such a proposal is ludicrous. It is not possible to compensate for the loss of remoteness for all New Zealanders and visitors with dollars to tour operators” Sue Maturin said.

“Doubtful Sound is a special remote place and its outstanding natural values need to be protected for all New Zealanders and visitors. What is needed is not tankers and ports but for the area to be protected as a marine park.”

ENDS

Contact: Sue Maturin
Phone 03 477 9677 (work), 03 4876 125 (home) or 025 222 5092 (mobile)


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Ground Rules: Government Moves To Protect Best Growing Land

“Continuing to grow food in the volumes and quality we have come to expect depends on the availability of land and the quality of the soil. Once productive land is built on, we can’t use it for food production, which is why we need to act now.” More>>

ALSO:

Royal Society: Calls For Overhaul Of Gene-Technology Regulations

An expert panel considering the implications of new technologies that allow much more controlled and precise ‘editing’ of genes, has concluded it’s time for an overhaul of the regulations and that there’s an urgent need for wide discussion and debate about gene editing... More>>

ALSO:

Retail: Card Spending Dips In July

Seasonally-adjusted electronic card spending dipped in July by 0.1 percent after being flat in June, according to Stats NZ. Economists had expected a 0.5 percent lift, according to the median in a Bloomberg poll. More>>

ALSO:

Product Stewardship: Govt Takes More Action To Reduce Waste

The Government is proposing a new way to deal with environmentally harmful products before they become waste, including plastic packing and bottles, as part of a wider plan to reduce the amount of rubbish ending up in landfills. More>>

ALSO:

Earnings Update: Fonterra Sees Up To $675m Loss On Writedowns

“While the Co-op’s FY19 underlying earnings range is within the current guidance of 10-15 cents per share, when you take into consideration these likely write-downs, we expect to make a reported loss of $590-675 million this year, which is a 37 to 42 cent loss per share." More>>

ALSO: