|
| ||
Mediation report should ring alarm bells |
||
Media release 9 April 2001
Mediation report should ring alarm bells - Knowles
It is not legitimate for restrictive work practices to be imposed on an innocent party as the result of mediation, says Employers' Federation chief executive Anne Knowles.
Ms Knowles says the mediator's report on Mainland Stevedoring and the Waterfront Workers' Union goes beyond its brief in calling for a compromise that penalises the innocent party.
"Given that the mediator has dismissed the four allegations made by the Waterfront Workers' Union, there was no need to propose a "compromise" between that union and the employer concerned.
"There has been no breach of contract, no breach of agreement and no breach of law by the company concerned. So there is no need to penalise that employer with restrictive work practices.
"In fact it is quite alarming that the mediator's report should suggest such a proposal. If accepted, it would set a dangerous precedent - that any outside party can 'muscle in' on an employment relationship that they are not a party to, and by causing enough fuss, can activate mediation and bring about restrictions on how a legitimate, law-abiding company goes about its business."
ENDS
Sky City : Auckland Convention Centre Cost Jumps By A Fifth
RMTU: Mediation Between Lyttelton Port And Union Fails
Science Policy: Callaghan, NSC Funding Knocked In Submissions
Scoop Business: Spark, Voda And Telstra To Lay New Trans-Tasman Cable
Statistics: Current Account Deficit Widens
Still In The Red: NZ Govt Shunts Out Surplus To 2016
Job Insecurity: Time For Jobs That Count In The Meat Industry

