Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 


Global Co: Mckinsey Report

MEDIA RELEASE


12 June 2001

GLOBAL CO:
McKINSEY REPORT


“Why have McKinseys watered-down their 1999 pre-conditions”, asked Mark Masters on behalf of Farmers for a Better Dairy Deal.

“Unless these pre-conditions are satisfied, McKinseys said two competing co-ops would be better than a Mega Co-op by $300 million”.

“In 1999, McKinseys recommended the Mega Co-op – a virtual monopoly – believing it could be made to behave like a competitive business in the absence of effective local competition”, said Mr Masters. “This is the heart of McKinsey’s position in 1999”.

“Was it realistic or practical? The Commerce Commission certainly didn’t think so”, noted Mark Masters.

“But for now, let’s run with McKinseys’ belief. Let’s assume you can stop a monopoly becoming inefficient in the absence of local effective competition. What were McKinseys’ ‘must do’ pre-conditions to deliver this? And what were McKinseys’ essentials to deliver the industry’s growth strategy?”

“In 1999, McKinseys said the strategy required an additional $4 billion of new share capital plus $8 billion of increased borrowings.”

“Now in 2001, McKinseys seem to be agreeing with Warren Larsen and the other leaders that Global Co doesn’t need any outside capital to achieve the strategy. What’s changed?”

“In 1999, McKinseys said the value-added business needed to be put in a separate corporate structure with outside shareholders, a new customer-driven culture, fresh management, ready to list on the stock exchange.

“Now in 2001, McKinseys seem to be agreeing with the industry leaders that this separate structure is not required to achieve the strategy. What’s changed?”

“In 1999, McKinseys said ownership of the value-added business should not be linked to milk supply.

“Now in 2001, McKinseys seems to be agreeing with the industry leaders that this ‘delinking’ is no longer required. Why? What’s changed?”

“In 1999, McKinseys said it was essential to ‘hard wire’ into Mega Co-op an obligation to achieve 4% efficiency gains every year.

“Now in 2001, McKinseys seem to agreeing with the industry leaders that this is no longer necessary. What’s changed?”

“In 1999, McKinseys said it was essential to have a ‘large minority’ of independent directors. McKinseys recommended 45% of directors should be independent. Now in 2001, McKinseys seem to be agreeing with the industry leaders that it’s enough for only 23% of directors to be independent. Why? What has changed?”

“In 1999, Mega Co-op was not going to be supervised by a special regulator. Now in 2001, Global Co will be. And McKinseys seem to be agreeing with the industry leaders that this is OK. What’s changed? How is this removing politics from the industry? (another of McKinseys’ ‘must dos’)

The list goes on – things that in 1999 were absolutely essential to McKinseys – are now no longer ‘must dos’. They’ve been watered-down. McKinseys are agreeing with the Global Co directors.”

“Where’s their analysis for this sudden change? What new information have they got? Where is the written update? Why haven’t farmers been informed?”

“From the information available to farmers, there is no basis whatsoever for concluding that Global Co meets the 1999 ‘must dos’.”

“I wonder if the Government has seen anything from McKinseys to show this? If so, why haven’t farmers?”

“Are our industry leaders reassuring McKinseys behind the scenes that the missing pre-conditions will be added later – after the vote?”

“If so, we need to know now!

“McKinseys said unless their 1999 pre-conditions were met, two competing co-ops would be better than a Mega Co-op by $300 million.”

“And it’s simply not good enough for Warren Larsen to feign that ‘he has no idea in hell’ where our figure of $4 billion in new share capital comes from. It comes from the 1999 McKinsey report – that Warren and his colleagues commissioned for millions and millions of dollars, using our money but not letting us see what they said in full”.

“Not good enough, Mr Larsen!”

ENDS
Inquiries to
Mark Masters
(06) 765 7544 (025) 541 729

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Sky City : Auckland Convention Centre Cost Jumps By A Fifth

SkyCity Entertainment Group, the casino and hotel operator, is in talks with the government on how to fund the increased cost of as much as $130 million to build an international convention centre in downtown Auckland, with further gambling concessions ruled out. The Auckland-based company has increased its estimate to build the centre to between $470 million and $530 million as the construction boom across the country drives up building costs and design changes add to the bill.
More>>

ALSO:

RMTU: Mediation Between Lyttelton Port And Union Fails

The Rail and Maritime Union (RMTU) has opted to continue its overtime ban indefinitely after mediation with the Lyttelton Port of Christchurch (LPC) failed to progress collective bargaining. More>>

Earlier:

Science Policy: Callaghan, NSC Funding Knocked In Submissions

Callaghan Innovation, which was last year allocated a budget of $566 million over four years to dish out research and development grants, and the National Science Challenges attracted criticism in submissions on the government’s draft national statement of science investment, with science funding largely seen as too fragmented. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Business: Spark, Voda And Telstra To Lay New Trans-Tasman Cable

Spark New Zealand and Vodafone, New Zealand’s two dominant telecommunications providers, in partnership with Australian provider Telstra, will spend US$70 million building a trans-Tasman submarine cable to bolster broadband traffic between the neighbouring countries and the rest of the world. More>>

ALSO:

More:

Statistics: Current Account Deficit Widens

New Zealand's annual current account deficit was $6.1 billion (2.6 percent of GDP) for the year ended September 2014. This compares with a deficit of $5.8 billion (2.5 percent of GDP) for the year ended June 2014. More>>

ALSO:

Still In The Red: NZ Govt Shunts Out Surplus To 2016

The New Zealand government has pushed out its targeted return to surplus for a year as falling dairy prices and a low inflation environment has kept a lid on its rising tax take, but is still dangling a possible tax cut in 2017, the next election year and promising to try and achieve the surplus pledge on which it campaigned for election in September. More>>

ALSO:

Job Insecurity: Time For Jobs That Count In The Meat Industry

“Meat Workers face it all”, says Graham Cooke, Meat Workers Union National Secretary. “Seasonal work, dangerous jobs, casual and zero hours contracts, and increasing pressure on workers to join non-union individual agreements. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
Standards New Zealand

Standards New Zealand
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news