Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Defunct computer retailer Gateway pleads guilty

Defunct computer retailer Gateway pleads guilty to breaching the Fair Trading Act: fined $21,000

A second conviction for false and misleading advertising has cost defunct computer retailer Gateway New Zealand Limited $21,000 in the Auckland District Court.

Gateway, which ceased operating in New Zealand in October and appointed a liquidator, pleaded guilty of breaching sections 10 and 13 of the Fair Trading Act.

This is the second time Gateway has breached the Act. The company was convicted and fined $21,500 in November 2000 for describing compulsory additional costs in small print only, in newspaper advertising.

It was only three months later that Gateway breached the Act with further misleading advertising.

In February, Gateway ran newspaper advertising promoting ex-demo and re-manufactured systems under the prominent heading "$999* and that's just for starters" showing a picture of a computer with a monitor, key board and mouse. However the monitor was not available with the system for $999. This representation breached sections 10 and 13(e) of the Act

Gateway also breached section 13(g) with the launch of its new Accessories page on the Gateway website with incorrect product pricing. A "dummy" price was used in place of the correct price and the website went live including the "dummy" price. It was accepted by Judge Unwin that it arose as a result of mistake.

Commerce Commission's Acting Chair Paula Rebstock said this case was a further reminder to traders that information or imagery in all forms of advertising, including newspapers and websites, must be accurate.

"When images are used to promote a product or deal, they must accurately represent what the trader is offering. Consumers are entitled to assume what they see or read in advertising is accurate," said Ms Rebstock. Ms Rebstock added that the fact that the website went live including the "dummy" price showed that Gateway had not checked the site properly before the launch, which shows poor compliance practise by Gateway which is disappointing considering the company had been prosecuted only three months earlier.

Judge Unwin's $21,000 fine, plus $430 court and solicitor's costs, comprised:

* $10,000 on the section 10 charge, together with $300 solicitor's costs, and $130 court costs on that charge;

* $2,500 on each of the four section 13(e) charges in respect of newspaper advertisements;

* $1,000 on the section 13(g) charge concerning the Website advertising.


© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


"Broad-Based Growth": GDP Rises 1 Percent In June Quarter

Gross domestic product (GDP) rose 1.0 percent in the June 2018 quarter, up from 0.5 percent last quarter, Stats NZ said today. This is the largest quarterly rise in two years. More>>


Judicial Review: China Steel Tarrif Rethink Ordered

On 5 July 2017 the Minister determined not to impose duties on Chinese galvanised steel coil imports. NZ Steel applied for judicial review of the Minister’s decision. More>>

Debt: NZ Banks Accelerate Lending In June Quarter

New Zealand's nine major lenders boosted lending at the fastest quarterly pace in almost two years as fears over bad debts subsided. More>>


Balance Of Trade: Annual Current Account Deficit Widens To $9.5 Billion

New Zealand’s current account deficit for the year ended June 2018 widened to $9.5 billion, 3.3 percent of GDP, Stats NZ said today. More>>