Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Piako Rating Dispute

11 July 2002

The Court of Appeal has released its decision upholding Environment Waikato's decision on rating for the Piako flood control scheme. The decision was appealed by the Piako Upper Catchment Group and Rodney Luxton in parallel cases.

Graeme Trower, chairman of the Piako Upper Catchment Group said, "The decision is disappointing for the hundreds of people who have generously given their moral and financial support in the battle for a fair rating system."

"The Court relied on the wide discretions and powers that the Rating Powers Act gives councils to rate. The judges pointed out that the particular section that Environment Waikato relied upon for the contributor rate "is not concerned with legal or moral fault or blame". They confirmed our interpretation that the contributor rate is no more than a rainfall tax."

The Court acknowledged that the appellants' land in the Morrinsville and Matamata areas 'is not enhanced in any tangible way' by the flood control scheme for which they are required to pay direct drainage benefit rates. However, the Court was persuaded by Environment Waikato that the Rating Power Act 'implicitly expands the ordinary connotation of the expression "direct benefit".

"What disappoints us most is that the decision was based on the specific provisions of Rating Powers Act, and not those in the Local Government Act, which are more principled and allow councils fewer discretions to do as they choose," said Mr Trower. "The Rating Powers Act has now been repealed, and if Environment Waikato had any moral fibre, it would allow an independent review of its decision against the Local Government Act alone."

Mr Trower agrees with Environment Waikato's chairman Neil Clarke that this is a hallmark decision having implications throughout New Zealand. "Mr Clarke's comments that other councils have been anxiously awaiting this decision can only mean that other councils will be rating every landowner in a river catchment to fund the protection of people on floodplains. Lowland people will be making demands for new schemes, knowing that they will be subsidised."

"It invites all councils to return to bad habits such as vote garnishing, by allowing them to ignore the principle that rates must be related to benefit," concluded Mr Trower.


© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Budget Policy Statement: 'Wellbeing Of NZers At The Heart Of Budget Priorities'

“We want a wellbeing focus to drive the decisions we make about Government policies and Budget initiatives. This means looking beyond traditional measures - such as GDP - to a wider set of indicators of success,” Grant Robertson said. More>>


Short Of 2017 Record: Insurers Pay $226m Over Extreme Weather

Insurers have spent more than $226 million this year helping customers recover from extreme weather, according to data from the Insurance Council of NZ (ICNZ). More>>

Environment Commissioner: Transparent Overseer Needed To Regulate Water Quality

Overseer was originally developed as a farm management tool to calculate nutrient loss but is increasingly being used by councils in regulation... “Confidence in Overseer can only be improved by opening up its workings to greater scrutiny.” More>>


Deal Now Reached: Air NZ Workers Vote To Strike

Last week union members voted overwhelmingly in favour of industrial action in response to the company’s low offer and requests for cuts to sick leave and overtime. More>>