Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Commission warns to be wary of cash-back schemes

Commission warns traders and consumers to be wary of cash-back schemes

The Commerce Commission is warning traders and consumers to be wary of cash-back schemes after receiving information that an Australian-based company, Cashback Australia Limited, is trying to get off the ground in New Zealand.

Cash-back schemes are typically promoted by their operators as a marketing tool for traders to attract customers. Under such schemes, traders can promote their products or services by offering rebate vouchers, enabling customers to redeem a portion of the purchase price after a specified period.

Director of Fair Trading Deborah Battell said that the Commission’s counterparts in New South Wales had issued a warning in January 2003 with respect to Cashback Australia due to concerns over the viability of the scheme the company operates and the fact that there were too many ways for businesses and consumers to miss out on the scheme’s benefits.

Cashback Australia lists a number of New Zealand companies it claims to be involved in the scheme on its website www.cashbackaustralia.com.au and has now registered itself in New Zealand as Cashback Redemptions NZ Limited.

“The operators of Cashback Australia promote the value of their scheme to traders through the concept of customers forgetting or failing to successfully redeem the vouchers, undoubtedly because the operators make it so complicated for customers to get their money back,” Ms Battell said.

The Commission understands that both the customer and the trader must register the claim with an Australian-based Trust within 14 days of the date of purchase. If a trader fails to do so, the customer’s claim will be rendered invalid.

“In the Commission’s view, this opens the scheme up to potential abuse by traders, over which consumers have absolutely no control. We are also concerned that there appears to be little protection for consumers should this happen.” said Ms Battell.

After the voucher is registered, the customer must wait for a specified period – between 13 and 51 months depending on the size of the claim – before contacting the company to claim the rebate.

“The length of the rebate period is dependent on the total amount of the rebate claimed, however it appears that this detail is not disclosed to customers until they contact the trader about the offer,” Ms Battell said.

Ms Battell said the Commission was also concerned that Cashback Australia had been misrepresenting in both promotional material and on its website that customers had the opportunity to claim up to 100% of their money back through the scheme. “The Commission is aware, however, that Cashback Australia has suggested to at least one New Zealand trader that they should never offer a 100% rebate, and that 50% would be more believable,” Ms Battell said.

“We have also received information that one New Zealand trader, advertised by Cashback Australia as a participating merchant, is not, and never has been, involved in the scheme,” said Ms Battell.

“Traders and consumers should ensure they know exactly what they are getting into before making marketing or purchasing decisions based on this scheme,” she said.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Media Mega Merger: StuffMe Hearing Argues Over Moveable Feast

New Zealand's two largest news publishers are appealing against the Commerce Commission's rejection of the proposal to merge their operations. More>>

Elsewhere:


Approval: Northern Corridor Decision Released

The approval gives the green light to construction of the last link of Auckland’s Western Ring Route, providing an alternative route from South Auckland to the North Shore. More>>

ALSO:


Crown Accounts: $4.1 Billion Surplus

The New Zealand Government has achieved its third fiscal surplus in a row with the Crown accounts for the year ended 30 June 2017 showing an OBEGAL surplus of $4.1 billion, $2.2 billion stronger than last year, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says. More>>

ALSO:

Mycoplasma Bovis: One New Property Tests Positive

The newly identified property... was already under a Restricted Place notice under the Biosecurity Act. More>>

Accounting Scandal: Suspension Of Fuji Xerox From All-Of-Government Contract

General Manager of New Zealand Government Procurement John Ivil says, “FXNZ has been formally suspended from the Print Technology and Associated Services (PTAS) contract and terminated from the Office Supplies contract.” More>>