Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Environmental Air Care fined $17,500

Environmental Air Care fined $17,500 for misleading claims about insect control products

Environmental Air Care Limited has been fined $17,500 and ordered to publish corrective advertising in the New Zealand Herald, Dominion Post and Press for making misleading claims about its Robocan time-dispensed insect control products, in breach of the Fair Trading Act.

The Commerce Commission laid charges against Environmental Air Care alleging that the way Environmental Air Care promoted its Robocan Insect Repellent and Robocan Insect Killer products gave the impression that they were substantially or entirely ‘natural’ products when this was not the case. Environmental Air Care pleaded guilty to the charges in the Auckland District Court yesterday.

Chair Paula Rebstock said that Environmental Air Care had made a number of claims in advertising including that the products used ‘mostly natural ingredients’ and were ‘based on natural pyrethrins’.

“In reality, while the products do contain pyrethrins, a natural insect control product, only 16.7 percent of the total active ingredients are natural.”

In addition, the Commission alleged that claims made that both products had MAF approval were misleading, as the Insect Repellent did not need, nor have approval, and the Insect Killer was only authorised by MAF for use in certain situations.

“The result of these misrepresentations, in conjunction with the misrepresentations that the product was substantially or entirely natural, may well have led customers to incorrectly believe that MAF was somehow endorsing the ‘naturalness’ of the products,” said Ms Rebstock.

“The term ‘natural’ is a powerful selling tool, especially in relation to insect control products. Therefore, any representations that the products are natural give Environmental Air Care an unfair advantage in the market.

“Customers who are influenced to purchase products such as these because of representations that they are natural, will generally not have the necessary specialist scientific knowledge to determine whether the claims being made are true.

“While customers should always be able to rely on the accuracy of claims being made by traders, in this case customers were particularly reliant on those claims being accurate” Ms Rebstock said.

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Media Mega Merger: StuffMe Hearing Argues Over Moveable Feast

New Zealand's two largest news publishers are appealing against the Commerce Commission's rejection of the proposal to merge their operations. More>>


Approval: Northern Corridor Decision Released

The approval gives the green light to construction of the last link of Auckland’s Western Ring Route, providing an alternative route from South Auckland to the North Shore. More>>


Crown Accounts: $4.1 Billion Surplus

The New Zealand Government has achieved its third fiscal surplus in a row with the Crown accounts for the year ended 30 June 2017 showing an OBEGAL surplus of $4.1 billion, $2.2 billion stronger than last year, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says. More>>


Mycoplasma Bovis: One New Property Tests Positive

The newly identified property... was already under a Restricted Place notice under the Biosecurity Act. More>>

Accounting Scandal: Suspension Of Fuji Xerox From All-Of-Government Contract

General Manager of New Zealand Government Procurement John Ivil says, “FXNZ has been formally suspended from the Print Technology and Associated Services (PTAS) contract and terminated from the Office Supplies contract.” More>>