Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Ruling Finds Pak’ N Save Breached Code Of Ethics

December 23, 2004


Second Ruling Finds Pak’ N Save Breached
Advertising Code Of Ethics

The Advertising Standards Complaints Board has upheld a second complaint that a recent Pak’ N Save advertising campaign contained exaggerated claims which were misleading to the consumer.

This is the second decision from the Advertising Standards Review Board in as many months on the matter. The first decision was based on a complaint brought by Progressive Enterprises against Foodstuffs (Auckland) Limited and this decision was in respect of Foodstuffs (Wellington) Co-operative Society Limited. Both decisions upheld Progressive Enterprises’ complaint.

In this decision, the Advertising Standards Review Board found that Pak’N Save’s campaign breached two rules in the Code of Ethics. Firstly, because it used research results in a manner which was misleading and deceptive to the consumer.

Secondly, the advertisements were also found to have made an unqualified claim on price, which was based on a snap shot survey of only 30 grocery items purchased on a specific day.

In addition, Pak’ N Save quoted a ‘leading consumer survey’, when in fact they were quoting from a short article in a newspaper which, in turn, was a summary of another article in a Consumer magazine.

The price survey was conducted by the Consumers’ Institute and was not intended for use in advertising or promotional advertising.

Progressive Enterprises Managing Director, Richard Umbers, says what Pak’ N Save said was misleading for shoppers.

“You cannot claim a national price advantage from a one-day snap shot survey.”

“Pak ‘N Save does not have the cheapest prices throughout New Zealand. Countdown is competing aggressively on price with Pak’ N Save across the country and shoppers are benefiting each day from the price war,” he says.

“Pak ‘N Save’s advertising campaign was misleading, deceptive and unethical.”

Mr Umbers urged shoppers to make their own price comparisons, “At the end of the day, shoppers know best and they should continue to test prices between Countdown and Pak’N Save for themselves.”

The Board also said the advertisements breached two Guidelines as they were not factual and informative and likely to mislead the consumer.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Media Mega Merger: StuffMe Hearing Argues Over Moveable Feast

New Zealand's two largest news publishers are appealing against the Commerce Commission's rejection of the proposal to merge their operations. More>>

Elsewhere:


Approval: Northern Corridor Decision Released

The approval gives the green light to construction of the last link of Auckland’s Western Ring Route, providing an alternative route from South Auckland to the North Shore. More>>

ALSO:


Crown Accounts: $4.1 Billion Surplus

The New Zealand Government has achieved its third fiscal surplus in a row with the Crown accounts for the year ended 30 June 2017 showing an OBEGAL surplus of $4.1 billion, $2.2 billion stronger than last year, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says. More>>

ALSO:

Mycoplasma Bovis: One New Property Tests Positive

The newly identified property... was already under a Restricted Place notice under the Biosecurity Act. More>>

Accounting Scandal: Suspension Of Fuji Xerox From All-Of-Government Contract

General Manager of New Zealand Government Procurement John Ivil says, “FXNZ has been formally suspended from the Print Technology and Associated Services (PTAS) contract and terminated from the Office Supplies contract.” More>>