Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

ASFONZ Submission on IRD Taxation of Investment


The government’s Discussion Document on the tax treatment of “collective investment vehicles”

The government released its Discussion Document on the “treatment of collective investment vehicles and offshore portfolio investments in shares” in June 2005.

ASFONZ has released its first submission today. In that submission, it agrees that the tax treatment of “collective investment vehicles” (“CIVs”) needs to change. What we have now, according to ASFONZ, is both illogical and unfair. The Discussion Document requested comments on a number of issues of detail concerning the government’s recently announced policy.

ASFONZ councillor Jill Spooner, said that ASFONZ decided to take a two-stage approach to its submissions on the Discussion Document:

- a paper released today[1] addresses issues of principle;

- a follow-up paper will address specific issues raised in the Discussion Document.

Jill Spooner said that ASFONZ expresses considerable concern at the practical implications of the principles on which the Discussion Document is founded. It strongly urges the government to re-visit the basis on which CIVs and their members should be taxed.

ASFONZ suggests in its initial submission that a “first principles” approach has not been taken to date. It says that the changes will inevitably produce unintended consequences. According to ASFONZ, they will also introduce an unnecessary layer of complexity that will at the same time raise costs, lower understanding and increase inequity.

According to ASFONZ, the proposals change the meaning of “income” in several ways, so it says that complexity will inevitably increase as providers test the boundaries. “We must expect that to happen”, said Jill Spooner. “That’s not a criticism – providers will not be doing their jobs unless they test those limits for competitive advantage.”

ASFONZ strongly believes that there is an alternative to the Discussion Document’s framework for a logical and fair basis for the tax treatment of both CIVs and their members/investors. In its initial submission, ASFONZ suggests a broad framework that should be used instead. That framework does not require the creation of the artificial definitions of income that the Discussion Document suggests but instead recognises the true nature of the transactions involved. ASFONZ suggests that both the current and any proposed regimes should be tested against the standard it describes.

The framework does not involve tax concessions for superannuation schemes or other CIVs. Instead, the objective is to tax savers’ CIV income on approximately the basis that would apply if the saver earned the income directly.

ASFONZ thinks that the national debate on a tax regime for CIVs needs to include an option that offers a “pure” attempt to flow income from the CIV to investor/members. That would mean members’ being taxed on the basis that they had earned the income directly. ASFONZ says that its submission offers a practical foundation that will see the “income” of investor/members calculated in ways that will be familiar to taxpayers. It suggests that the Discussion Document recommends a regime that moves away from natural concepts of “income”.

ASFONZ councillor Jill Spooner said that “ASFONZ urges the government to restart the process of developing a robust and workable framework for the tax treatment of CIVs and their members.” She said “Even now, it is not too late to start again. Surely it is better to get it right.”

[1] Part 1 of our submission on the discussion document concerning collective investment vehicles - Issues of principle

About ASFONZ

ASFONZ is "the Voice of Workplace Super" in New Zealand. It is a voluntary, not-for-profit organisation made up of major workplace superannuation schemes as well as their professional advisers and service providers.

We are widely representative of workplace schemes, with a membership that embraces all types of superannuation– public and corporate, union-sponsored and industry-based - as well as individuals interested in superannuation issues.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Media Mega Merger: StuffMe Hearing Argues Over Moveable Feast

New Zealand's two largest news publishers are appealing against the Commerce Commission's rejection of the proposal to merge their operations. More>>

Elsewhere:


Approval: Northern Corridor Decision Released

The approval gives the green light to construction of the last link of Auckland’s Western Ring Route, providing an alternative route from South Auckland to the North Shore. More>>

ALSO:


Crown Accounts: $4.1 Billion Surplus

The New Zealand Government has achieved its third fiscal surplus in a row with the Crown accounts for the year ended 30 June 2017 showing an OBEGAL surplus of $4.1 billion, $2.2 billion stronger than last year, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says. More>>

ALSO:

Mycoplasma Bovis: One New Property Tests Positive

The newly identified property... was already under a Restricted Place notice under the Biosecurity Act. More>>

Accounting Scandal: Suspension Of Fuji Xerox From All-Of-Government Contract

General Manager of New Zealand Government Procurement John Ivil says, “FXNZ has been formally suspended from the Print Technology and Associated Services (PTAS) contract and terminated from the Office Supplies contract.” More>>