Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


ARC ignored own report ; hijacked by staff

Media statement Thursday, January 12th, 2006

ARC ignored own report ; hijacked by staff

A report commissioned by the ARC from Auckland Professor Basil Sharp was hijacked by council staff last May, resulting in its conclusions being misrepresented and the council agreeing to increase its business rates differential.

But the ARC then gave no opportunity for the report or the staff interpretation of it to be rebutted.

The Sharp Report delivered to the ARC on May 25th last year found that in no way could a business differential be justified. A further report commissioned by Auckland business from economist Greg Dwyer agreed.

But in a memorandum to the council two ARC staff grossly misinterpreted the Sharp report’s findings to draw the opposite conclusion of its author.

The Employers & Manufacturers Association today released documents containing this information. (see below)

“Auckland business has vigorously opposed the introduction of a business differential on the grounds that businesses do not receive benefits from the ARC more than those received by other property owners,” said Alasdair Thompson, EMA’s chief executive.

“ARC’s rates are based on a property’s capital value which means far more in rates are generally paid by business than for other types of property.

“Nevertheless in 2004 the ARC introduced a business differential level of rate 50 per cent higher again than for other property owners.

“After strenuous objections the ARC eventually agreed to seek an independent report that would analyse the benefits received by business ratepayers from the ARC in return for rates paid.

“The purpose of the report was to assess whether it was fair to charge businesses more in rates than other properties, or not.

“Basil Sharp from Auckland University’s Department of Economics was ultimately engaged and eventually delivered his report to the ARC on May 25th, 2005.

“Sharp pointed out that 76 per cent of the activities of the ARC provide what he calls ‘general’ benefits (para 12).

“He said most benefits (79 per cent) were assessed as having a low likelihood of providing any benefits to business.

“In Paragraph 13 Professor Sharp says: ‘It would be most misleading to attempt quantification, even, for example, attempting to allocate a percentage cost as a benefit to business.’

“Despite that, council staff in a memorandum misrepresented Professor Sharp’s advice, and told the ARC councillors that they had extrapolated from Sharp’s report direct and general benefits to business from ARC services.

“The ARC then went on to increase the differential to 60 per cent and without making the Sharp report or its findings public until after submissions on the ARC’s Annual Plan had closed for the 2005/06 year.

“Incensed by the misrepresentation of the Sharp report to councillors, Auckland business commissioned their own review of Professor Sharp’s work from economist Greg Dwyer along with the staff memo that misrepresented it.

“Dwyer is highly critical of the ARC staff memorandum. He concluded: ‘The quality of public policy analysis reflected in the ARC’s claimed expansion of the Sharp report is woeful. The ARC memorandum detracts from an informed understanding of the Sharp report (refer p 36 of the main report - The executive summary of the Dwyer report is attached)

“Dwyer sought information from council staff and was supplied a large number of papers on rating policy but he found ‘none contained an analysis that would justify a business differential on the capital value rating basis.’

“He concluded: ‘The onus (remains) on the ARC to demonstrate that its rating policy is derived from a principled analysis and reflects a genuine commitment to act in the best interests of all ratepayers and residents rather than an arbitrary policy essentially aimed at appeasing residential ratepayers The ARC has not yet discharged that responsibility.’ (see p vii).


See... Rating Business, October 2005 (Dwyer Report Executive Summary)

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Marketing Rocks!
Ig Nobel Award Winners Assess The Personality Of Rocks

A Massey University marketing lecturer has received the 2016 Ig Nobel Prize for economics for a research project that asked university students to describe the “brand personalities” of three rocks. More>>


Nurofen Promotion: Reckitt Benckiser To Plead Guilty To Misleading Ads

Reckitt Benckiser (New Zealand) intends to plead guilty to charges of misleading consumers over the way it promoted a range of Nurofen products, the Commerce Commission says. More>>


Half A Billion Accounts: Yahoo Confirms Huge Data Breach

The account information may have included names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, hashed passwords (the vast majority with bcrypt) and, in some cases, encrypted or unencrypted security questions and answers. More>>

Rural Branches: Westpac To Close 19 Branches, ANZ Looks At 7

Westpac confirms it will close nineteen branches across the country; ANZ closes its Ngaruawahia branch and is consulting on plans to close six more branches; The bank workers union says many of its members are nervous about their futures and asking ... More>>

Interest Rates: RBNZ's Wheeler Keeps OCR At 2%

Reserve Bank governor Graeme Wheeler kept the official cash rate at 2 percent and said more easing will be needed to get inflation back within the target band. More>>


Half Full: Fonterra Raises Forecast Payout As Global Supply Shrinks

Fonterra Cooperative Group, the dairy processor which will announce annual earnings tomorrow, hiked its forecast payout to farmers by 50 cents per kilogram of milk solids as global supply continues to decline, helping prop up dairy prices. More>>



Get More From Scoop

Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news