Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

'Work-life balance' debate terms questioned

Canterbury Manufacturers’ Association.
Media Release.
27 July 2006.


The Canterbury Manufacturers’ Association says that while flexibility in workplace patterns can benefit both employer and employee, the Association questions the whether the debate concerning ‘work-life balance’ is being conducted on the right basis. “In my mind, the way the question is framed polarises “work and life” suggesting the need to trade off one against the other, perhaps it is better to see work as one of the many components that determine a balanced life”, asks CEO John Walley.

“There is ‘no-one-size-fits-all’ objective characterisation of a balanced life. An arrangement that is suitable for one individual including the arrangements with their employer will not necessarily work for another or even the same person and their employer on another occasion. So efforts to determine the level of ‘work-life balance’ for people in a generic context through regulation are doomed at the outset”.

Mr. Walley suggests that the issue requires discussion in the workplace. “Each individual has the responsibility to try and optimise how the various components of their life interact, over time they will change as will the needs of the workplace. This is a matter for discussion not regulation.

“For some people, work has greater significance than it does for others and the hours and effort they apply to their job will differ from those around them. For everyone, as life progresses, demands and interests change in type and degree.”

What is the right solution or balance is subjective – how can this be regulated? It is a matter for each person to determine as best they can and regulation will not help. Simply sending the message that work and life are polarised extremes is not helpful.

“The role an individual has within a firm should be considered in this debate”, says Mr. Walley. “Finding ‘balance’ and making changes to workplace patterns for one person may have ramifications for those around them. If an employee changes their pattern of work does this mean that all other employees are entitled to do so as well? A firm’s operational and workplace structure may be able to accommodate the odd change but not changes that effect larger numbers of people without impacting competitiveness”.

Having made a decision to allow a change to a working pattern Mr. Walley says that firms need to be able to reinstate the earlier pattern without involving the Employment Tribunal.

“The Tribunal has an important role to play in this process but it does not have to be the decisive one”, says Mr. Walley. “The Tribunal is qualified to judge on employment matters but not the wider business issues that affect a firm’s performance. Once changes to workplace patterns are made they should be subject to continuous review and a firm should be able reinstate previous working patterns if the business situation requires it”.

“Finding a ‘balance’ within a person’s workplace patterns is important to them and their employer but the requirements and competitiveness of the business needs to be considered in this debate. True flexibility works both ways”.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

ScoopPro: Helping The Education Sector Get More Out Of Scoop

The ScoopPro professional license includes a suite of useful information tools for professional users of Scoop including some specifically for those in the education sector to make your Scoop experience better. More>>

Big Tax Bill Due: Destiny Church Charities Deregistered

The independent Charities Registration Board has decided to remove Destiny International Trust and Te Hahi o Nga Matamua Holdings Limited from the Charities Register on 20 December 2017 because of the charities’ persistent failure to meet their annual return obligations. More>>

57 Million Users' Data: Uber Breach "Utterly Preventatable"

Cybersecurity leader Centrify says the Uber data breach of 57 million customer and driver records - which the ride-hailing company hid for more than a year - was “utterly preventable”. More>>

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

Having A Cow? Dairy Product Prices Slide For Fourth Straight Auction

Dairy product prices fell at the Global Dairy Trade auction, retreating for the fourth straight auction amid signs of increased production... Whole milk powder fell 2.7 percent to US$2,778 a tonne. More>>

ALSO:

Statistics: Butter At Record $5.67/Block; High Vegetable Prices

Rising dairy prices have pushed food prices up 2.7 percent in the year to October 2017, Stats NZ said today. This followed a 3.0 percent increase in the year to September 2017. More>>

ALSO:

Science: New Research Finds Herbicides Cause Antibiotic Resistance

New University of Canterbury research confirms that the active ingredients of the commonly used herbicides, RoundUp, Kamba and 2,4-D (glyphosate, dicamba and 2,4-D, respectively), each alone cause antibiotic resistance at concentrations well below label application rates. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  • Bill Bennett on Tech