Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Emissions Trading Scheme Is Flawed Design

News Release

11 September 2008

Emissions Trading Scheme Is Flawed Design

The passage of the most ambitious emissions trading scheme in the world will come at a high cost to the New Zealand economy, according to the Greenhouse Policy Coalition, representing the energy intensive sector.

Executive director of Greenhouse Policy Coalition, Catherine Beard says the scheme has been rushed through under urgency for political expediency and there will be a huge number of problems that will emerge from the most complex legislation ever attempted in New Zealand.

“As people in business know better than politicians, there are high costs and risks in being a first mover and you need to have deep pockets. Unfortunately the deep pockets that will be called on to fund this ambitious scheme will be all businesses and householders.”

Catherine Beard said the major scheme risks were the loss of international competitiveness, the disincentive for economic growth and the high and volatile price of carbon.

“Any new investment will face the full international price of carbon – with no allocation of units to offset the cost – unless those units are taken off other trade exposed companies thereby reducing their competitiveness in a global market.”

Catherine Beard said the price of carbon on international carbon markets has increased by over 200% in the last year and the government should have provided for a price safety valve as is being contemplated in Australia.

“While at current carbon prices a household could expect to be paying an extra $600 in energy costs a year; if carbon prices continue on the same upward trend that cost could be considerably higher when electricity generation enters the scheme in 2010”.

Catherine Beard says a better scheme design would be one that involved international benchmarking of industry and agriculture on a “worlds best practice” basis. “Those that are operating at world’s best practice in energy intensity should be able to grow, while those that are not at world’s best practice would face a price of carbon.”

“Capping emissions at a historical point in time will mean that future production will shift to countries where there is no price on carbon, thereby exporting our industry and employment opportunities to other countries where the environmental performance is likely to be more carbon intensive than in New Zealand.”

“This is a scheme that needs to be fixed and fixed soon - before new investment goes to other countries.”


© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Back Again: Government Approves TPP11 Mandate

Trade Minister Todd McClay says New Zealand will be pushing for the minimal number of changes possible to the original TPP agreement, something that the remaining TPP11 countries have agreed on. More>>


By May 2018: Wider, Earlier Microbead Ban

The sale and manufacture of wash-off products containing plastic microbeads will be banned in New Zealand earlier than previously expected, Associate Environment Minister Scott Simpson announced today. More>>


Snail-ier Mail: NZ Post To Ditch FastPost

New Zealand Post customers will see a change to how they can send priority mail from 1 January 2018. The FastPost service will no longer be available from this date. More>>


Property Institute: English Backs Of Debt To Income Plan

Property Institute of New Zealand Chief Executive Ashley Church is applauding today’s decision, by Prime Minister Bill English, to take Debt-to-income ratios off the table as a tool available to the Reserve Bank. More>>


Divesting: NZ Super Fund Shifts Passive Equities To Low-Carbon

The NZ$35 billion NZ Super Fund’s NZ$14 billion global passive equity portfolio, 40% of the overall Fund, is now low-carbon, the Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation announced today. More>>