Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Car guide slams Chinese vehicles

Car guide slams Chinese vehicles

The first Chinese-made vehicles to arrive in Australasia have been savaged in a review by the car buyers’ Dog & Lemon Guide, which describes them as: “a clumsy and unsafe copy of several existing Japanese vehicles.”

The review slams the Great Wall SA220 and V240 utes on virtually all fronts, including appearance, safety, performance, fuel economy and handling.

Editor Clive Matthew-Wilson – whose road safety research was awarded by the Australian Police Journal – adds: “One of the reasons these vehicles are so cheap is that many vital safety features have been simply left off in an effort to lower the price.”

“The Great Wall SA220 ute comes without airbags and all versions have a lap-only seatbelt in the centre-rear position. Lap-only seatbelts are known to practically rip the wearer in half in a serious collision, even if the other occupants walk away unscathed.”

“Most concerning, however, is that many five-seater utes these days are often used as family vehicles. In a major collision, the occupants of these utes are at serious risk of life-threatening injury. The Great Wall utes meet the Australian Design Regulations (ADR), but this simply proves that the ADR regulations are woefully inadequate.”

Describing both vehicles as blatant copies of recent Japanese models, the review notes that the manufacturers: “seem to have grabbed large hunks of styling and technology from various Japanese manufacturers and reassembled these parts into a ‘new’ vehicle.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The inside of the utes is described as having a: “faux-Isuzu interior that looks okay but smells like the toy department at a discount warehouse and the plastics give off flimsy vibes.”

The review also slams the utes’ performance and handling, saying: “the ride on both versions of this ute is stiff and rough. The ride quality when empty is about the same as a 1980s Toyota Land Cruiser.”

The review concludes: “Would we buy one of these utes with our own money? That’s an easy ‘no’. There have been too many safety compromises and we are unconvinced that the makers of these utes have grasped the fine art of building reliable vehicles.”

However, Matthew-Wilson adds that people shouldn’t underestimate the Chinese car industry.

“The Chinese car industry is in its infancy. Chinese cars are currently pretty terrible, but don’t forget that Japanese cars were once pretty terrible, too. Now Japan’s cars dominate the world. In the future, Chinese cars may dominate the world.”

“Great Wall Motors may become one of the world’s great car companies, but right now their products simply aren’t good enough for Western markets.”

“Think of these utes as the first troops stumbling ashore at the beginning of an invasion.”

The Dog & Lemon Guide review can be viewed @ http://dogandlemon.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/great-wall-wingle-v240-sailor-sa220-current.pdf

• The Great Wall SA220 utility is sold as the ‘Sailor’ in most of the world, while the V240 is sold internationally as the ‘Wingle’.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.