Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Quarry operators used as council cash cows

Media Release – for immediate release
15 October 2009


New Zealand quarry operators used as council cash cows

Local authorities are imposing punitive and unreasonable costs on quarry operators, the New Zealand Contractors’ Federation warned today.

Waikato District Council (WDC) has demanded the owners of the locally-owned Porritt sand quarry at Tamahere near Hamilton pay more than $1 million for heavy vehicle impact fees and road alterations before draft consent clauses are approved.

The road alterations and heavy vehicle impact fee of 17 cents per cubic metre to WDC, plus a further five cents per cubic metre to Waipa District Council, highlight a worrying trend emerging with a growing number of councils forcing unfair costs onto quarries.

“As is often the case, such additional costs hit smaller local businesses hard,” said Jeremy Sole, CEO of the NZ Contractors’ Federation.

“Many quarries are run by small operators. Neil and Linda Porritt’s quarry is not a gold mine so while WDC insists it is not imposing a fee or levy, it’s our view that this is just another example of revenue-raising. The reality is that these costs will eventually have to be passed onto contractors and trucking firms.”

He added: “The impact fee alone is excessive given the $1 million contribution already required to fund modifications to the highest impacted section of road, and particularly compared to the two or three cents per cubic metre paid at the Waikato Ngaruawahia rock quarry. The impact of quarry traffic on district roads has also been overstated.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Mr Sole said trucking firms already pay road user charges and councils impose a roading contribution when granting permissions for subdivisions.

“No-one is trying to deny that heavy loads or more loads cause added wear and tear to roads. However, we are concerned that contractors, trucking firms, their customers and ultimately ratepayers may end up paying multiple times for their impact on roads.”

The existing rates are based on averaging out the overall maintenance costs generated by road users going about their business, said Mr Sole.

He added: “If more councils follow this trend of imposing heavy impact fees on aggregate suppliers, then the logging industry, fertiliser or dairy firms may be next.

“A clear national policy is needed on this issue. Until that happens, different councils will take different approaches, uncertainty will reign, and accusations will continue to fly that local authorities are succumbing to the temptation of revenue gathering and double dipping.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.