Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Repeat Offender Fined $45,000 for Unguarded Machinery


4 August 2011

Repeat Offender Kiwi Plastics Fined $45,000 for Unguarded Machinery

A Porirua plastics manufacturing company, which has been prosecuted in the past for failing to guard machinery, has been fined $45,000 for a similar offence.

In the latest incident, Kiwi Plastic Company Limited was convicted of failing to guard two of its bag sealing machines. During an unannounced visit, Department of Labour inspectors found that the guards had been removed for approximately three months. The Department’s investigation also found that an employee had been taught to over-ride automatic shut down mechanisms.

Kiwi Plastics and its director, Angelus Tay, were prosecuted for similar offences in 2002 when three employees were seriously injured.

The Department has made several visits to the company since then and issued a number of warnings and improvement notices. There have also been 32 negotiated agreements with the company to improve work practices.

The Department’s Wellington Service Manger, Dave Hulston says this persistent offending is simply unacceptable. “We’ve worked with this company to try to improve procedures and the $45,000 fine sends a very strong message to other employers to take machine guarding in the workplace seriously,” he says.

Mr Hulston says the case relates to two side sealer machines used to manufacture plastic supermarket bags which have heat sealers running at about 210 degrees Celsius and hole punches that can potentially cause serious injury.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

In a reserved sentencing decision District Court Judge Broadmore said Mr Tay “talked the talk” on workplace safety, but noted that ‘walking the walk’ was also essential. Judge Broadmore said the company accepted this and admitted that its safety record was mostly “minimum compliance”.

Judge Broadmore said the company’s success in avoiding injuries to its employees in the recent past had been attributable to increased vigilance by the Department of Labour.

The Department has a project under way to reduce the number and severity of machinery-related accidents.

The Safe Use of Machinery project involves Inspectors visiting companies using machinery and talking to employers about machine guarding and reminding them of their responsibilities under the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 to keep employees safe while at work.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.