Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Rubbish bag company fined heavily over environment claims

Rubbish bag company fined heavily for misleading environmental claims
Issued 19 November 2013
Release No. 41
Eco-Pal Ltd (Eco-Pal), a manufacturer of plastic rubbish bags, has been sentenced in the Auckland District Court for environmental claims it made that breached the Fair Trading Act (FTA).

Eco-Pal has been found guilty of 15 breaches of the FTA and fined $60,000 for claiming on its bags and its website that its rubbish bags were oxo-biodegradable, biodegradable, suitable for domestic composting and for claims giving the impression of environmental friendliness. A critical aspect of the company’s advertising found to have been liable to mislead was the slogan “Here today….gone tomorrow.”

Eco-Pal sold a range of bags that contained the additive d2W that it claimed made the bags “oxo-biodegradable.” The bags were marketed on the basis that there was an environmental benefit in using the oxo-biodegradable plastic bags over conventional plastic bags. Eco-Pal’s marketing gave the impression that its products would degrade over a reasonably short time, including when disposed of in a landfill, and were suitable for domestic composting. However the claims were liable to mislead as, while it is technically true that oxo-biodegradable plastic bags can break down in the right conditions, this will not occur within a short timeframe and in a landfill it has a minimal chance of occurring at all. Further, the bags were unsuitable for domestic composting.



In August this year, Pacrite Industries Limited was fined $30,000 after pleading guilty to ten charges in relation to claims about the oxo-biodegradability and environmental friendliness of its plastic rubbish bags, marketed as “Greensac” or “The Green One”. Pacrite no longer sells those bags.

In sentencing today, Judge Hinton said Eco-Pal’s behaviour amounted to serious offending.

“There is a sure appetite for environmentally friendly products, especially those that have an everyday or frequent use. There are very good policy reasons to penalise traders who disappoint customers and take economic advantage of competitors. Well intentioned shoppers were prejudiced on a reasonably substantial scale.”

Commerce Commission Consumer Manager, Stuart Wallace, said the Commission was pleased that companies who make inaccurate environmental claims are being held accountable for the failures in their advertising.

“Environmental issues are of significant importance to New Zealanders. Advertising such as this will cause more people to buy these products in the belief they are benefiting the environment when, in fact, there is little or no benefit whatsoever.”

“Eco-Pal is the second company convicted of this type of behaviour in the last few months. Businesses must ensure that consumers are able to rely on environmental claims and are not misled by inaccurate claims,” said Mr Wallace.

Background

The Fair Trading Act 1986 is designed to protect consumers and make competition more effective. If competition is to be effective, consumers need to be able to rely on the information provided by companies about the goods and services they offer.

False or misleading representations can distort competition and a competitive advantage can be gained by using unfair methods. The Commission is responsible for enforcing the Fair Trading Act. You can read more about the Fair Trading Act and environmental claims in our fact sheet http://www.comcom.govt.nz/environmental-claims/


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Tax Bill Passes, Drops: “An End To Unnecessary Secondary Tax”

“The changes mean Inland Revenue will more closely monitor the tax paid by wage and salary earners through the year. If it appears the worker is being over taxed, Inland Revenue will suggest a more suitable PAYE tax code tailored to that worker.” More>>

ALSO:

Ethiopian Airline Crash: Boeing 737 Max Aircraft Operations Temporarily Suspended

New Zealand’s Civil Aviation Authority has suspended the operation of Boeing 737 MAX aircraft to or from New Zealand. Currently this affects only one operator, Fiji Airways. There are no other airlines that fly this aircraft type to New Zealand. More>>

ALSO:

Sorting Out DNA: Crime-Busting Software Wins Top Science Prize

Software developed in New Zealand that has contributed to identifying suspects in tens of thousands of criminal cases around the world has won the 2018 Prime Minister’s $500,000 Science Prize. More>>

ALSO:

In The High Court: IRD Wins Tax Avoidance Case

Inland Revenue has won a High Court case against Eric Watson’s Cullen Group over a nearly $52 million tax debt. More>>

ALSO:

Insurers Withdraw From Market: Plea For EQC Rethink

A consumer watchdog wants the government to rethink the Earthquake Commission (EQC) as more people are pushed out of getting property and contents insurance. More>>

ALSO:

Women's Day: New Zealand Rated Third Best In OECD For Working Women

New Zealand has been rated among the top countries in the world for working women. The Women in Work Index rated New Zealand third in the OECD and it was the only country outside Europe to make the top 10. More>>

ALSO: