Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Review panel misses accident root causes

Review panel misses accident root causes

The Forest Industry Contractors Association (FICA) has slammed the consultation document prepared by the Independent Forest Safety Review for a lack of health and safety credibility. There is a glaring lack of root cause analysis and factual data as a basis for discussions with forestry workers.

Spokesman John Stulen said, “The document is full of union-prompted innuendo and fiction. The panel has failed to get root cause analysis of the very accidents that brought about the call for a review. Where are the facts about hours of work across industry? What are the rates of pay? What are the underlying causes of accidents? Where and when do they happen, and to whom? Without these facts to support a conversation with our industry there is not much reliable to go on.”

So far, panel members have steered clear of accessing our long-standing industry-driven ‘Incident Reporting Information System’ operates and the facts it holds. The root cause analysis of 10,000 near misses is far stronger than arguing about the cause of 10 fatalities. Facts, not emotion, are the pathway to a real solution.

If they looked they would see it shows that for over 5 years we have been focused on the key areas of serious harm with results now starting to show through. There has been a marked reduction in these accidents since late 2013. There is some fiction in options put forward which suggest that if unions are pushed in they are somehow going to solve all of our problems. It’s time the panel realised they should start the facts and science of health and safety to see where the real solutions will be found.”

“Too many assumptions have been made, based on very loud politically-driven opinions of people, with very little understanding or connection to our industry.”

“The facts are that forestry has three kinds of operators – the good, the bad and the really ugly. Our members are very good – most are mainly tertiary-accredited to the ACC system for workplace safety management plans, many are exceptional and have won National pan- industry safety awards. The many part-time operators are other rural contractors that have quickly set up harvesting crews; they’re the bad ones; often working without employment contracts or providing proper protective equipment. The really ugly ones are those who don’t obey the most basic laws about notification required for commencing bush work. WorkSafe inspectors don't even know they’re out there operating!”

“Many of the suggested options are completely obvious, for example, asking whether all forestry workers should have employment contracts that meet minimum standards. That’s not an issue among our members’ workforces. It’s simply what that the WorkSafe inspectors should have been enforcing as part of their job for the rest. But for years the’ve been denied adequate resources to do properly by constant restructuring.”

Stulen says the real solutions are to get rid of shady operators now once and for all. He says it’s a job that WorkSafe inspectors have shied away from in the past but it is time for them to front

up and find the shady operators in farm forests. Many fly-by-night operators have never had a visit from a WorkSafe inspector.

“The panel’s discussion document is looks too tainted by unions. They want to use this process to get laws changed to give them priority access to our workers. Well, we’re confident that workers with our contractor members will tell the panel that consultation and inclusion have always been a part of the workplaces they are in.”

As it stands, Stulen says, this review is at risk of becoming just another superficial look from the outside industry without fully understanding the root causes of what’s gone wrong.

“We have tried to engage with unions on injury prevention and accident investigation but unless they get their own way 100%, they just throw a tantrum and walk out of the room. They wouldn’t ever be willing to accept the science of fact-based health and safety solutions because it does not suit their agenda to get mandatory worker representation.”


© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Banks: Westpac Keeps Core Government Transactions Contract

The local arm of Westpac Banking Corp has kept its contract with the New Zealand government to provide core transactions, but will have to share peripheral services with its rivals. More>>


Science Investment Plan: Universities Welcome Statement

Universities New Zealand has welcomed the National Statement of Science Investment released by the Government today... this is a critical document as it sets out the Government’s ten-year strategic direction that will guide future investment in New Zealand’s science system. More>>


Scouring: Cavalier Merger Would Extract 'Monopoly Rents' - Godfrey Hirst

A merger of Cavalier Wool Holdings and New Zealand Wool Services International's two wool scouring operations would create a monopoly, says carpet maker Godfrey Hirst. The Commerce Commission on Friday released its second draft determination on the merger, maintaining its view that the public benefits would outweigh the loss of competition. More>>


Scoop Review Of Books: She Means Business

As Foreman says in her conclusion, this is a business book. It opens with a brief biographical section followed by a collection of interesting tips for entrepreneurs... More>>


Hourly Wage Gap Grows: Gender Pay Gap Still Fixed At Fourteen Percent

“The totally unchanged pay gap is a slap in the face for women, families and the economy,” says Coalition spokesperson, Angela McLeod. Even worse, Māori and Pacific women face an outrageous pay gap of 28% and 33% when compared with the pay packets of Pākehā men. More>>


Housing: English On Housing Affordability And The Economy

"Long lead times in the planning process tend to drive prices higher in the upswing of the housing cycle. And those lead times increase the risk that eight years later, when additional supply arrives, the demand shock that spurred the additional supply has reversed. The resulting excess supply could produce a price crash..." More>>


Get More From Scoop

Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news