Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Court upholds souvenir sentences

Court upholds souvenir sentences

The High Court has rejected an appeal by four companies and four individuals who were convicted and fined a total of $601,900 for selling visiting Asian tourists imported alpaca goods as “Made in New Zealand”, and making claims that duvets were 100% alpaca or merino wool when they were not.

In September 2013 the four companies and four directors pleaded guilty in the District Court at Rotorua and were convicted and fined a total of $601,900 for breaches of the Fair Trading Act. Organised tour groups from China, Korea and Taiwan were taken to several premises where they were sold items such as alpaca rugs, alpaca and merino duvets. The tourists were misled about the origin of alpaca rugs, labelled as being made in New Zealand when in fact they were imported from Peru. False claims by two of the companies were also made about the duvets, claims they were 100% alpaca or merino wool when they were not. The High Court decision endorses the District Court Judge’s finding that there was a significant loss suffered by affected consumers because they had no opportunity to shop elsewhere and if the products were labelled correctly they would have paid a fraction of the prices they did.

In the High Court judgment, which confirmed the sentences, Justice Duffy dismissed claims that the defendants did not realise the mislabelling was false or misleading because they were naïve and because English was not their first language, saying “This argument is not tenable, given the circumstances of the offending.”

Justice Duffy said “The magnitude of this fraud required a stern sentence.” The Judge emphasised that the products were “….knowingly sold to customers who, because they were mainly overseas visitors and English was their second language had little, if any, means of discovering this fraud.“

Commerce Commission Chairman, Dr Mark Berry, said “The Commission is pleased that the sentences have been confirmed on appeal. It is important that New Zealanders and visitors to New Zealand can trust that what they are being told is true. Labelling and representing products in this manner not only misleads buyers but also has the potential to discredit the New Zealand tourism industry.”

In April 2013 two other companies (Top Sky and Kiwi Wool) and two individuals were convicted and fined a total of $259,000 for similar breaches. Two additional companies are due to be sentenced in the Auckland District Court later this year for similar conduct.

Background

The four companies and four individuals that had the appeals against their sentences under the Fair Trading Act dismissed are:


Name Fine


Hyeon Company Limited $105,000
Duvet 2000 Limited $200,000
Mr Han Young Chae (director of Hyeon and Duvet 2000) $ 24,500
JM Wool Limited $182,000
Mr Jong Myung Lee (director of JM Wool Limited) $ 21,000
Premium Alpaca New Zealand Limited $ 56,000
Mr Yun Duk Jung (director of Premium Alpaca New Zealand Limited) $ 6,700
Mr Bo Sun Yoo (director of Premium Alpaca New Zealand Limited) $ 6,700

The original charges brought by the Commerce Commission under the Fair Trading Act followed search warrants executed on ten premises in Rotorua and one in Auckland in August 2011. The search warrants were a multi-agency initiative which involved the Commerce Commission, Police, Customs, Immigration and the Wildlife Enforcement Group. Tourism New Zealand assisted the investigation.

Previous media releases on the cases mentioned
April 2013
http://www.comcom.govt.nz/the-commission/media-centre/media-releases/detail/2013/penalties-for-souvenir-companies-that-misled-tourists-with-untrue-claims

September 2013
http://www.comcom.govt.nz/the-commission/media-centre/media-releases/detail/2013/four-more-souvenir-companies-fined-for-misleading-tourists


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Superu Report: Land Regulation Drives Auckland House Prices

Land use regulation is responsible for up to 56 per cent of the cost of an average house in Auckland according to a new research report quantifying the impact of land use regulations, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says. More>>

ALSO:

Fletcher Whittled: Fletcher Dumps Adamson In Face Of Dissatisfaction

Fletcher Building has taken the unusual step of dumping its chief executive, Mark Adamson, as the company slashed its full-year earnings guidance and flagged an impairment against Australian assets. More>>

ALSO:

No More Dog Docking: New Animal Welfare Regulations Progressed

“These 46 regulations include stock transport, farm husbandry, companion and working animals, pigs, layer hens and the way animals are accounted for in research, testing and teaching.” More>>

ALSO:

Employment: Most Kiwifruit Contractors Breaking Law

A Labour Inspectorate operation targeting the kiwifruit industry in Bay of Plenty has found the majority of labour hire contractors are breaching their obligations as employers. More>>

ALSO:

'Work Experience': Welfare Group Opposes The Warehouse Workfare

“This programme is about exploiting unemployed youth, not teaching them skills. The government are subsidising the Warehouse in the name of reducing benefit dependency,” says Vanessa Cole, spokesperson for Auckland Action Against Poverty. More>>

ALSO:

Internet Taxes: Labour To Target $600M In Unpaid Taxes From Multinationals

The Labour Party would target multinationals operating in New Zealand to ensure they don't avoid paying tax if it wins power and is targeting $600 million over three years through a "diverted profits tax," says leader Andrew Little. More>>

ALSO: