Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Modest Homes Beating Mansions Should Spur Rethink


Results a compelling argument to choose new over renovation

For immediate release

Homebuyers have been given a compelling argument to choose a new build over major renovations, with the latest Registered Master Builder House of the Year results.

A leading industry advisor says several top accolades awarded to new homes in the $350,000 to $450,000 bracket of the prestigious awards prove that you do not need to build a million-dollar mansion to have a supreme home built with craftsmanship. That opens up exciting opportunities for people who might have thought a quality new home was out of their budget, says Richard Gough, General Manager of industry authority Future-Proof Building.

“These results show that you can get a quality family home at an affordable price – a fixed price with a 10-year guarantee. Compare that to a major renovation that is difficult to get a fixed price for because you are not really sure about the scale of the job until you open up the house, and the result is half an old house and half a new one that will need more work in the foreseeable future.”

The last of the 11 Registered Master Builders House of the Year regional awards were announced last Friday [subs: Friday, August 22], across New Zealand three regions took the Supreme Award for homes in the $350,000 to $450,000 bracket selected above homes that included $1million-plus builds. Two of those Supreme Award winners also won Craftmanship accolades.

The awards are categorised by build costs only, and do not include the land. That the more affordable supreme award winners come from outside major cities – Mid/South Canterbury, Waikato and Manawatu/Wanganui – does not negate the same standard applying in metropolitan areas, Gough says.

He suggests people should look to buy sections in greenfield sites, or a less pristine property where house removal is an option.

“Find the right land and you can be far better off. Either purchase a section, or buy a property and have the house taken away. Often house removers will pay to take it. I don’t know why more people don’t consider doing it,” Gough says.

“You get a brand new home to suit your needs. Or spend less for an older house and invest $100,000 on doing it up, and get something that isn’t quite right. It won’t be nearly as liveable.

“The $350,000 to $450,000 bracket is a modest amount for a superb family home. The difference between a $450,000 home and a million-dollar one often comes down to the complexity of the build – a flat section or a steep one with limited access – the number of rooms, how many storeys, choice of materials and your budget. You can have a $6,000 kitchen or a $60,000 one.”

Future-Proof Building provides advice and solutions to build homes that meet owner’s needs now and in the years to come. Made up of the market leaders, its advice and solutions are segmented into eight smart principles including know-how on spatial design, health and safety, sustainability and being energy smart.

Judging criteria for each property includes whether the home demonstrates planning for the future, whether it ensures the ongoing maintenance and operating costs are sustainable, and whether the property has good air flow and passive ventilation.

To view Future-Proof Building showhomes from a range of building companies, including virtual tours and e-books, go to


© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Banks: Westpac Keeps Core Government Transactions Contract

The local arm of Westpac Banking Corp has kept its contract with the New Zealand government to provide core transactions, but will have to share peripheral services with its rivals. More>>


Science Investment Plan: Universities Welcome Statement

Universities New Zealand has welcomed the National Statement of Science Investment released by the Government today... this is a critical document as it sets out the Government’s ten-year strategic direction that will guide future investment in New Zealand’s science system. More>>


Scouring: Cavalier Merger Would Extract 'Monopoly Rents' - Godfrey Hirst

A merger of Cavalier Wool Holdings and New Zealand Wool Services International's two wool scouring operations would create a monopoly, says carpet maker Godfrey Hirst. The Commerce Commission on Friday released its second draft determination on the merger, maintaining its view that the public benefits would outweigh the loss of competition. More>>


Scoop Review Of Books: She Means Business

As Foreman says in her conclusion, this is a business book. It opens with a brief biographical section followed by a collection of interesting tips for entrepreneurs... More>>


Hourly Wage Gap Grows: Gender Pay Gap Still Fixed At Fourteen Percent

“The totally unchanged pay gap is a slap in the face for women, families and the economy,” says Coalition spokesperson, Angela McLeod. Even worse, Māori and Pacific women face an outrageous pay gap of 28% and 33% when compared with the pay packets of Pākehā men. More>>


Housing: English On Housing Affordability And The Economy

"Long lead times in the planning process tend to drive prices higher in the upswing of the housing cycle. And those lead times increase the risk that eight years later, when additional supply arrives, the demand shock that spurred the additional supply has reversed. The resulting excess supply could produce a price crash..." More>>


Get More From Scoop

Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news