Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


NZ Fair Trading Act amended – unsubstantiated representation

NZ Fair Trading Act amended – unsubstantiated representations

In the intensely competitive marketplace of today, businesses are forever looking for new and innovative ways to promote their goods and services to an increasingly discerning public.

However, merchants who do so need to take care when pushing their products not to make unsubstantiated representations.

You should be aware that the regulator can serve a “substantiation notice” on you, requiring you to give information and/or produce documents capable of supporting a claim or representation. If you fail to comply with the substantiation notice, you commit an offence unless you can prove that you:

(a) Acted honestly and reasonably; and

(b) Having regard to all the circumstances of the case, ought fairly to be excused.

Until recently, there was no provision in New Zealand but the New Zealand Fair Trading Act has now been amended in an ongoing effort to harmonise consumer law in both jurisdictions (New Zealand and Australia).

In New Zealand, section 12A of the Fair Trading Act now prohibits persons in trade from making representations that are not substantiated. A representation is said to be unsubstantiated if you do not have reasonable grounds for making the representation at the time the representation is made. This applies irrespective of whether the representation is false or misleading.

The New Zealand Act includes an exclusion for representations that “a reasonable person would not expect to be substantiated” – this means representations that are so obviously exaggerated or overstated that they are unlikely to mislead anyone (otherwise known as “puffery”) do not have to be substantiated.

Such an exclusion is not explicit in Australian consumer law, though case law indicates that if a statement is merely puffery, it does not constitute a representation for the purposes of the Act.

Examples of the kinds of representations requiring substantiation would include:

“Tests prove that…”,

“Doctors recommend that…”,

“available to you at factory prices”.

Essentially, the requirement applies to any representations that consumers should be able to rely on when making decisions about your products or services.

Although the provisions regarding substantiation of representations are expressed differently, practically speaking, the New Zealand and the Australian legal frameworks are aligned.

This means that businesses on both sides of the Tasman need to take care that:

(a) All representations made (that are not puffery) are capable of substantiation; and

(b) Records supporting such substantiation are well maintained.


© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Mycoplasma Bovis: More Properties Positive

One of the latest infected properties is in the Hastings district, the other three are within a farming enterprise in Winton. The suspect property is near Ashburton. More>>


Manawatū Gorge Alternative: More Work Needed To Choose Route

“We are currently working closely and in partnership with local councils and other stakeholders to make the right long-term decision. It’s vital we have strong support on the new route as it will represent a very significant long-term investment and it will need to serve the region and the country for decades to come.” More>>


RBNZ: Super Fund Chief To Be New Reserve Bank Governor

Adrian Orr has been appointed as Reserve Bank Governor effective from 27 March 2018, Finance Minister Grant Robertson says. More>>


ScoopPro: Helping PR Professionals Get More Out Of Scoop has been a fixture of New Zealand’s news and Public Relations infrastructure for over 18 years. However, without the financial assistance of those using Scoop in a professional context in key sectors such as Public Relations and media, Scoop will not be able to continue this service... More>>

Insurance: 2017 Worst Year On Record For Weather-Related Losses

The Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ) announced today that 2017 has been the most expensive year on record for weather-related losses, with a total insured-losses value of more than $242 million. More>>