Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Confidentiality breach affected successful business

Confidentiality breach affected successful business - Banking Ombudsman

The Privacy Act applies to individuals only. However banks also owe a duty of confidentiality to all customers that provides they must not disclose customer information except in very limited circumstances. “We treat such complaints just as seriously as Privacy Act complaints,” Banking Ombudsman Deborah Battell said.

A bank recently had to pay the owners of a successful business $20,000 when their business’s confidentiality was breached by a bank employee accessing the company accounts.

“The bank employee had left the bank and was connected with a new company competing directly with theirs. It appeared the employee had obtained commercially sensitive information about how their business operated while employed by the bank.

“The bank confirmed the employee had methodically accessed their accounts. On the face of it, this access didn’t appear to have any legitimate or authorised purpose. In addition to the duty of confidentiality, the bank’s employee code of conduct provided clear guidelines on access to and use of customer information,” Ms Battell said.

The complainants initially didn’t want the bank to contact its former employee as they were also contemplating legal action. This meant the bank couldn’t establish whether there was a legitimate reason for the access and so couldn’t take any further action on the complaint.

“When we got involved we explained the bank’s position, and they gave the okay for the bank to speak with its employee but it was unfortunately unable to do so.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“At this point, because it couldn’t provide us with information showing access had been legitimate or authorised, the bank accepted its employee had likely breached the bank’s code of conduct and duty of confidentiality. Its $20,000 offer to compensate was accepted,” Ms Battell.

The Banking Ombudsman Scheme recently published a new Quick Guide on privacy and confidentiality explaining how the scheme approaches privacy and confidentiality complaints.

Ends


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
GenPro: General Practices Begin Issuing Clause 14 Notices

GenPro has been copied into a rising number of Clause 14 notices issued since the NZNO lodged its Primary Practice Pay Equity Claim against General Practice employers in December 2023.More

SPADA: Screen Industry Unites For Streaming Platform Regulation & Intellectual Property Protections

In an unprecedented international collaboration, representatives of screen producing organisations from around the world have released a joint statement.More

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.