Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Anti-dumping consumer welfare test unfair to NZ businesses

Anti-dumping consumer welfare test unfair to NZ businesses, lobby group says

By Joshua Riddiford

Aug. 28 (BusinessDesk) - The government’s plans to introduce a consumer welfare test to anti-dumping laws will put local firms at a disadvantage to their foreign counterparts, according to Business New Zealand.

Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Paul Goldsmith yesterday announced plans to write a test into legislation to weigh up the impact dumped goods have on a manufacturer against the wider effects on industries and consumers, before duties are imposed.

Business NZ executive director of manufacturing Catherine Beard said New Zealand companies operate in one of the least protected economies in the world, and it was unfair that they should have to compete with foreign companies operating on a different playing field.

“In some cases, companies can do it because of domestic support from their governments,” Beard said.

Dumping is the practice of manufacturers exporting products to another country at a price which is lower than the price at which they are sold in their domestic market.

A duty or financial penalty is imposed on those dumped products considered to harm New Zealand manufacturers or a local industry.

Beard said by letting foreign companies dump cheap products on the local market as a loss-leader, New Zealand firms could be squeezed out: “Is that good for the New Zealand business ecosystem?”

Eric Crampton, head of research at think-tank the New Zealand Initiative, said anti-dumping legislation typically reduced market competition, and if the welfare test benefited consumers that was probably for the greater good.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“In general, anti-dumping legislation is fraught because it can be used in an anti-competitive fashion,” Crampton said.

The government considered introducing an automatic termination period (ATP) on anti-dumping duties, but shelved the proposal after representatives from the Hawkes Bay fruit growers industry lobbied against the measure.

Last year the government announced the removal of tariffs and duties on building materials covered under existing legislation with the intention of improving housing affordability.

(BusinessDesk)

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
GenPro: General Practices Begin Issuing Clause 14 Notices

GenPro has been copied into a rising number of Clause 14 notices issued since the NZNO lodged its Primary Practice Pay Equity Claim against General Practice employers in December 2023.More

SPADA: Screen Industry Unites For Streaming Platform Regulation & Intellectual Property Protections

In an unprecedented international collaboration, representatives of screen producing organisations from around the world have released a joint statement.More

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.