Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

ComCom warns roofer on cartel behaviour


ComCom warns roofer on cartel behaviour

By Suze Metherall

Oct. 7 (BusinessDesk) - The Commerce Commission has formally warned Consolidated Alloys N.Z. for cartel-like behaviour after the Australian-owned manufacturer used a settlement over a patent dispute to try and restrict roofing products available in New Zealand.

In June 2013 the Auckland-based manufacturer negotiated a settlement with competitor Edging Systems (NZ) resolving a commercial dispute about whether Edging System's EZ-Edge product breached the Consolidated Alloys' registered patent over soft-edge flashing products used on homes with metal roofs, the competition watchdog said in a statement. As part of the settlement the New Plymouth-based roofing products maker paid a lump sum and royalties on annual sales of its EZ-Edge product, while also agreeing not to sell any other soft-edge flashing products covered by the patent until June 2030.

In October 2013, Consolidated Alloys approached Edging System over its new product, Vent Edge, which the Australian firm said breached the conditions of the settlement but didn't take any further action.

The regulator began investigating in September 2014 after Edging Systems came to the commission seeking immunity for alleged cartel conduct affecting competition.

The commission said while the settlement's clause may have been inserted to protect royalty payments, restricting sales was likely to "substantially" lessen competition. Edging Systems' two products had brought competition and led to some price decreases the regulator said. Following the commission's investigation, Consolidated Alloys formally advised it would not enforce the restrictive clause and had also not prevented the competitor from selling Vent Edge.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“Without a court ruling we can’t determine whether the patent validly applied to any of ESL’s flashing products," chair Mark Berry said. "However, we believe the clause would have restricted competition after the patent expired, ultimately impacting on customers’ choice. Clauses like this protect established products by limiting innovation and the development of more efficient or better value products that benefit consumers."

The commission said it considered a public warning appropriate and would take no further action.

Consolidated Alloys registered the patent in 1995 and it expired in August this year.

(BusinessDesk)

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.