Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Kiwifruit NZ ordered to reconsider marketing proposals

Friday 06 May 2016 04:18 PM

CORRECT: Kiwifruit NZ ordered by High Court to reconsider marketing proposals from Seeka, Splice

(Corrects name of industry regulator to Kiwifruit NZ)

By Fiona Rotherham

May 6 (BusinessDesk) - The High Court told kiwifruit industry regulator Kiwifruit New Zealand to reconsider collaborative marketing proposals from Splice Fruit and Seeka Kiwifruit to sell fruit offshore that its board had previously rejected.

When Zespri was set up in 1999 the government made it the sole entity entitled to export kiwifruit to anywhere other than Australia but also allowed for collaborative marketing where third parties can seek approval from the Kiwifruit NZ board to export in association with Zespri.

Te Puke kiwifruit exporters and marketers Splice Fruit and Seeka Kiwifruit sought approval from the High Court at Tauranga for a judicial review of three Kiwifruit NZ board decisions last December rejecting collaborative marketing proposals in the 2016 export season. Splice wanted to export 400,000 trays of green Class I fruit to Austria while Seeka wanted to export 400,000 trays of green fruit to Hainan Island in China and 120,000 trays of green fruit to Xinjiang province in China.

A fast-tracked court hearing was held because the 2016 season is already underway.

The applicants claim the Kiwifruit NZ board acted unreasonably in rejecting their applications. The rationale for rejecting Splice’s proposal was that it wasn’t entirely consistent with the marketing strategy of creating brand value and premium returns to New Zealand suppliers and didn’t meet the test of creating overall wealth of New Zealand kiwifruit suppliers.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

In the two Seeka cases, it was considered that fruit destined for Hainan Island could “leak” into mainland China and create “confusion and disruption” in a very large market which could depress prices, while in the Xinjiang province the board said it was worried selling under the Seeka brand would lead to a “substitution risk for Zespri branded programmes”.

It had been industry practise for some years to allow parties to appeal decisions made by the relevant collaborative marketing committees to a Kiwifruit NZ board appeal committee. Seeka chief executive Michael Franks told the court the appeals process was important because members of the board committees making the decision on collaborative marketing “often have conflicts of interest” as they are direct competitors. “In the past, the appeals process afforded Seeka an opportunity for a cost efficient review by alternative members,” he said.

Kiwifruit NZ had legal advice from senior counsel in November that the board had no jurisdiction to hear appeals.

However Justice Paul Heath said in his written judgment that “it was open to the board to regulate its own procedure by incorporating a review process of that type, whether the label 'appeal' or 'review' is used is beside the point.”

Based on past experience, both kiwifruit exporters were entitled to believe a process of that type would be followed if applied for, he said, and a rehearing by the board or a nominated committee is necessary in all three cases.

Kiwifruit NZ's 2014/15 annual report shows collaborative marketing volumes dropped during the season to 1.6 million trays out of 97 million trays exported. The report said on average 93 percent of collaborative marketing applications in the past decade had been approved although “disappointedly, none have evolved into high volume, significantly innovative and wealth-enhancing arrangements that meet the regulatory criteria”.

In February this year, Zespri signed a memorandum of understanding with T&G to grow exports, three years after the listed produce company abandoned its long-running legal fight against the kiwifruit marketer’s statutory export dominance. It is was the first deal of its kind to be approved by Kiwifruit NZ.

(BusinessDesk)


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
GenPro: General Practices Begin Issuing Clause 14 Notices

GenPro has been copied into a rising number of Clause 14 notices issued since the NZNO lodged its Primary Practice Pay Equity Claim against General Practice employers in December 2023.More

SPADA: Screen Industry Unites For Streaming Platform Regulation & Intellectual Property Protections

In an unprecedented international collaboration, representatives of screen producing organisations from around the world have released a joint statement.More

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.