Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
$520 moisturiser fails to impress, Consumer NZ finds
19 October 2016
$520 moisturiser fails to impress, Consumer NZ finds
A Consumer NZ test of moisturisers has found paying
for a top-shelf cream doesn’t guarantee superior results.
Consumer NZ chief executive Sue Chetwin said the test of nine moisturisers found a $13 cream outperformed the most expensive, luxury-priced La Mer: the Moisturising Gel Cream, which retails for $520.
Most of the creams delivered good results, providing performance on a par with the standard cream used in the test as a control. But the $520 La Mer gel cream was an exception, delivering only average results.
Testing measured the moisturising efficacy of the creams after four weeks of daily use. Products were blind tested by women aged between 25 and 66 years with a normal to dry skin type.
“If you’re looking for a moisturiser, you don’t need to splash out on a high-priced product. You can find creams for less than $20 that will do the job,” Ms Chetwin said.
Consumer NZ is also advising shoppers not to place much store in claims products are “hypoallergenic” or “dermatologically tested”.
“There’s no standard definition of these terms. Products carrying the claims can also contain potential allergens such as fragrances and preservatives. If you have sensitive skin or want to avoid certain chemicals, your best bet is checking the ingredients list,” Ms Chetwin said.
Moisturisers are regulated by the Cosmetic Products Group Standard. The standard requires products to display an ingredients list, a batch code and contact details for the manufacturer or supplier.
The full report is available online at consumer.org.nz and will be published in the November issue of Consumer.
About the test
The moisturising efficacy of the nine creams was tested by corneometry. A corneometer is used to provide a measure of the skin’s hydration. Measurements were taken prior to and after use of the products over a four-week period. Creams were applied twice daily.
Measurements were performed in humidity- and temperate-controlled conditions. Volunteers applied the moisturising cream to one forearm. The control product was applied to their other arm. Testing was commissioned by International Consumer Research and Testing, London.
ends
Business Canterbury: Urges Council To Cut Costs, Not Ambition For City
Wellington Airport: On Track For Net Zero Emissions By 2028
Landcare Research: ANZAC Gall Fly Release Promises Natural Solution To Weed Threat
NZ Anti-Vivisection Society: Auckland Rat Lovers Unite!
University of Canterbury: $1.35 Million Grant To Study Lion-like Jumping Spiders
Federated Farmers: Government Ends War On Farming
