Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Reminder to businesses about ‘Made in New Zealand’ claims


The Commerce Commission is reminding all businesses that any ‘Made in New Zealand’ claims they make about their products must be accurate, able to be substantiated and must not mislead consumers about the country of origin.

The Fair Trading Act (FTA) prohibits businesses from making false or misleading claims about the country of origin of their products. Symbols such as kiwis or the New Zealand flag can also convey a misleading impression about the origin of the product if, in fact, it is not manufactured or produced in New Zealand.

Whether a product is ‘made in New Zealand’ depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the product and what consumers understand about it. Some examples help explain how the meaning of “made” can vary depending on the product:
For a clothing item, where is it changed from fabric into a garment?
For a food item, where were the ingredients grown?
For a manufactured product, was it substantially manufactured in NZ? Where was the primary componentry made? Were any substantial stages of manufacture conducted offshore?
Commissioner Anna Rawlings says consumers will often be influenced by the origin of goods when they are considering whether to buy something and are likely to – and are entitled to – rely on the information provided by the retailer about origin.

“Some consumers are happy to pay a higher price for goods which they believe are made in New Zealand, and for some, this represents an important ethical decision. Country of origin claims are also important for local manufacturers that want to protect the value placed on a genuinely New Zealand made product.”

“Any labelling must be clear and truthful. For example, if a manufacturing process includes steps taken within New Zealand and overseas, some brands choose to explain this with labelling such as ‘Packaged in New Zealand using imported ingredients’. For clothing, an accurate claim might say “Designed in NZ and manufactured in China,” she said.

This reminder to businesses follows nine complaints received by the Commission about the accuracy of some t-shirt “Made in NZ” labelling by clothing brand, WORLD.

After a preliminary assessment of these complaints, the Commission has opened an investigation. We are currently unable to make any further comment on that investigation.

The Commission has produced a video called ‘If you can’t back it up, don’t say it’ which offers guidance to traders about being able to substantiate that their representations are true.

Background
You can also find out more about country of origin claims in our factsheet on place of origin representations.

Country of origin labelling
Suppliers of new clothing and footwear have specific country of origin labelling requirements under the Fair Trading Act in addition to being prohibited from making false or misleading country of origin claims. The Consumer Information Standard for Country of Origin (Clothing and Footwear) Labelling includes a requirement that suppliers attach to the clothing or footwear a permanent label with the country of origin. You can read more about country of origin labelling here.

Other country of origin cases

The Commission has taken a number of country of origin cases in recent years which include:
In May 2017 a health supplement company and its owner were fined more than $500,000 for claiming that bee pollen was New Zealand-made when the bee pollen was sourced from China.
In April 2016 the High Court found that a health supplement company’s “New Zealand made” claims were misleading because all the active ingredients were imported from overseas.
Since 2011 the Commission prosecuted 11 companies and 11 individuals for selling imported alpaca rugs as “Made in New Zealand”, and/or for claiming duvets were predominantly alpaca, merino wool or cashmere when they were not. A total of more than $1.5 million in fines had been ordered when the most recent company was fined in 2017.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Forest & Bird: Report Find Council Failures On Effluent

The report exposes significant inconsistencies and gaps in how regional councils are enforcing the rules around dairy effluent management. More>>

ALSO:

Mana In Mahi: Helping Young New Zealanders Into Work

Thousands of young people will be given the chance to gain valuable qualifications and meaningful work under the Mana in Mahi – Strength in Work scheme launched by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern today. More>>

ALSO:

Reserve Bank: Official Cash Rate Unchanged At 1.75 Percent

The Official Cash Rate (OCR) remains at 1.75 percent. We expect to keep the OCR at this level through 2019 and into 2020, longer than we projected in our May Statement. The direction of our next OCR move could be up or down. ... More>>

Post-Cabinet Press Conference: Trade Stuff

Jacinda Ardern and David Parker's press conference that focused on the government's 'trade for all agenda' plans for widespread consultation on the shape of future trade agreements... More>>

ALSO:

Debt Capital Markets Summit: Grant Robertson On The Economy

"In short, the heart of our Government’s economic plan is to help New Zealand become a more productive, more sustainable, and more inclusive economy in which all New Zealanders can thrive." More>>

ALSO:

Best Environment Practice For Landcorp Farms: New Forest & Bird And Pāmu Collaboration

New Zealand’s largest conservation organisation and largest farming group have agreed to work together to promote best environmental practice in New Zealand’s farming sector. More>>