Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

EPA chemical reassessment rational, says Agcarm

15 October 2018

EPA chemical reassessment rational, says Agcarm

A strong food supply and healthy livestock are vital for the future of New Zealand’s primary industries and economy. The government reviews the tools that play an essential role in the fight against pests and diseases that threaten these.

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) today announced its decision on the chemicals it will reassess. Part of this review evaluates the benefits and potential health risks posed by pesticides – ensuring they meet environmental and health safety standards.

The EPA has ranked 727 chemicals with an A to F ranking, with A being the most harmful. Despite recent attention, Glyphosate has been given an E rating (low risk).

Agcarm chief executive, Mark Ross, says that the regulator’s approach is reasonable. “It’s sensible to retain low-risk products to manage pests and diseases, especially when there are no better alternatives. In fact, often, the alternative options are worse.”

The regulator reviews chemicals every few years, as alternatives find their way to market, and export and market requirements change. This allows the EPA to address exposure, label instructions, and mitigation measures.

The EPA must find reasonable certainty of no harm before registering or re-registering a pesticide. This also applies to reassessing an existing tolerance (pesticide residue limit).

Risk derives from toxicity and exposure – so the way pesticides are used is an essential part of the risk assessment.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The EPA’s risk assessment processes are put in place when evaluating chemicals. “Part of the process involves assessing the benefits of the chemicals to New Zealand. It’s important not to overlook this,” says Ross.

This is because the Authority must be confident that its assessments are scientifically-valid. If controls on chemicals need to be updated then it is important that the EPA go about this using a scientific risk-based method in consultation with industry.

“There can be no political, social or media interference,” adds Ross.

Agcarm supports the regulator’s approach and will work closely with it to form part of the conversation on reviewing the vital tools for New Zealand’s primary sector.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
GenPro: General Practices Begin Issuing Clause 14 Notices

GenPro has been copied into a rising number of Clause 14 notices issued since the NZNO lodged its Primary Practice Pay Equity Claim against General Practice employers in December 2023.More

SPADA: Screen Industry Unites For Streaming Platform Regulation & Intellectual Property Protections

In an unprecedented international collaboration, representatives of screen producing organisations from around the world have released a joint statement.More

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.