Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Report shows flaws in RBNZ's bank capital proposals

A report by Tailrisk Economics on the Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s latest 60 page attempt to explain its proposal to sharply increase bank capital, shows that the Bank’s analysis is totally unconvincing. ‘We stand by our previous assessment that the proposals will be very expensive and bring few benefits. The present value of the costs could be more than $30 billion’ said Ian Harrison principal of Tailrisk Economics.

The Bank has now released three differing papers explaining the proposals, which, in itself is a concern. A robust policy process would not have required repeated attempts at backfilling and further explanations.

The latest paper plays the ‘wider social cost’ card for the first time, but the Bank grossly misrepresents the literature it extensively quotes. ‘The World Bank and the UN did not say that banking crises have long lasting effects as the Bank claims’ Harrison explained, ‘ the clear message was that the social costs in any economic downturn are substantially mitigated in countries, which, like New Zealand, have robust social safety nets.

‘The new ‘risk tolerance framework’ is a muddled approach to setting bank capital requirements’ explained Harrison. ‘The Bank has creating a problem of its own making by finding the banking system to be ‘unsound’ and then has fabricated the ‘evidence’ to support an arbitrary decision to increase bank capital.’

Other supervisors have similar mandates to the Reserve Bank’s, but none have attempted to quantify it, and define ‘soundness’ in terms of the probability of a banking crisis. Both terms are too subjective to be useful metrics to drive policy in a mechanistic fashion.

There has been a corrosion of the quality of the Bank’s policy analysis. The analysis of the inputs into the Bank’s capital model is an embarrassment to New Zealand and undermines the Bank’s credibility. The Reserve Bank continues to ignore the critical fact that the banking system is mostly foreign owned.

On any reasonable assessment the banking system is sound. We do not need the Reserve Bank to impose large costs on the economy to ‘make New Zealand sound again’.


The report ‘Third time lucky?’ is available at tailrisk.co.nz/documents
Earlier reports, ‘The 30 Billion Dollar Whim’ and ‘Tailrisk Pinocchio’ awards are also available on that site.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Up 0.5% In June Quarter: Services Lead GDP Growth

“Service industries, which represent about two-thirds of the economy, were the main contributor to GDP growth in the quarter, rising 0.7 percent off the back of a subdued result in the March 2019 quarter.” More>>

ALSO:

Pickers: Letter To Immigration Minister From Early Harvesting Growers

A group of horticultural growers are frustrated by many months of inaction by the Minister who has failed to announce additional immigrant workers from overseas will be allowed into New Zealand to assist with harvesting early stage crops such as asparagus and strawberries. More>>

ALSO:

Non-Giant Fossil Disoveries: Scientists Discover One Of World’s Oldest Bird Species

At 62 million-years-old, the newly-discovered Protodontopteryx ruthae, is one of the oldest named bird species in the world. It lived in New Zealand soon after the dinosaurs died out. More>>

Rural Employers Keen, Migrants Iffy: Employment Visa Changes Announced

“We are committed to ensuring that businesses are able to get the workers they need to fill critical skills shortages, while encouraging employers and regions to work together on long term workforce planning including supporting New Zealanders with the training they need to fill the gaps,” says Iain Lees-Galloway. More>>

ALSO:

Marsden Pipeline Rupture: Report Calls For Supply Improvements, Backs Digger Blame

The report makes several recommendations on how the sector can better prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from an incident. In particular, we consider it essential that government and industry work together to put in place and regularly practise sector-wide response plans, to improve the response to any future incident… More>>

ALSO: