Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Report shows flaws in RBNZ's bank capital proposals

A report by Tailrisk Economics on the Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s latest 60 page attempt to explain its proposal to sharply increase bank capital, shows that the Bank’s analysis is totally unconvincing. ‘We stand by our previous assessment that the proposals will be very expensive and bring few benefits. The present value of the costs could be more than $30 billion’ said Ian Harrison principal of Tailrisk Economics.

The Bank has now released three differing papers explaining the proposals, which, in itself is a concern. A robust policy process would not have required repeated attempts at backfilling and further explanations.

The latest paper plays the ‘wider social cost’ card for the first time, but the Bank grossly misrepresents the literature it extensively quotes. ‘The World Bank and the UN did not say that banking crises have long lasting effects as the Bank claims’ Harrison explained, ‘ the clear message was that the social costs in any economic downturn are substantially mitigated in countries, which, like New Zealand, have robust social safety nets.

‘The new ‘risk tolerance framework’ is a muddled approach to setting bank capital requirements’ explained Harrison. ‘The Bank has creating a problem of its own making by finding the banking system to be ‘unsound’ and then has fabricated the ‘evidence’ to support an arbitrary decision to increase bank capital.’

Other supervisors have similar mandates to the Reserve Bank’s, but none have attempted to quantify it, and define ‘soundness’ in terms of the probability of a banking crisis. Both terms are too subjective to be useful metrics to drive policy in a mechanistic fashion.

There has been a corrosion of the quality of the Bank’s policy analysis. The analysis of the inputs into the Bank’s capital model is an embarrassment to New Zealand and undermines the Bank’s credibility. The Reserve Bank continues to ignore the critical fact that the banking system is mostly foreign owned.

On any reasonable assessment the banking system is sound. We do not need the Reserve Bank to impose large costs on the economy to ‘make New Zealand sound again’.

The report ‘Third time lucky?’ is available at
Earlier reports, ‘The 30 Billion Dollar Whim’ and ‘Tailrisk Pinocchio’ awards are also available on that site.

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Real Estate: Auckland House Price Deflation Accelerates

The decline in Auckland house prices is starting to accelerate as the number of house sales plummet, not just in Auckland but in most parts of the country. More>>


'Wellbeing Budget': Grant Robertson Pre-Budget Speech

There has been a fair amount of attention in the media here and internationally on this year’s budget – our country’s first Wellbeing Budget. Enough for me to be invited to the recent Spring Meetings of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, to talk about our approach... More>>


New Vodafowners: Vodafone Sale To Infratil Consortium

Vodafone Group Plc has today announced the conditional sale of 100% of Vodafone New Zealand Limited to a consortium of long-term investors, New Zealand-based Infratil, and Canada-based Brookfield Asset Management. More>>


Ice Cream: Global Giant Buys Tip Top From Fonterra

Froneri has today agreed to acquire the iconic New Zealand ice cream business Tip Top from global dairy co-operative Fonterra with completion expected by the end of the month. More>>