Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Bob Jones loses again in voidable transactions case

By Victoria Young

Aug. 9 (BusinessDesk) - Bob Jones has lost a Supreme Court appeal over rental payments to one of his companies for the firm formerly known as Blue Chip.

The property magnate has fought for years with the liquidators for Blue Chip, which is now called Northern Crest. The finance company had leased a building owned by Jones.

Back in 2017 at the High Court stage, liquidators Anthony McCullagh and Stephen Lawrence argued Jones's company Robt Jones Holdings skipped the queue when it received payments ahead of other creditors.

The liquidators sought to make about $800,000 in payments made to Jones's company voidable.

Liquidators can apply to void a transaction if they believe it has left other creditors at a disadvantage and can meet a statutory test. Doing so puts the money back into the liquidators’ pool to be distributed among creditors.

Having lost in the High Court and Court of Appeal, lawyers for Jones went to the Supreme Court in April this year to argue the transaction was not voidable under the Companies Act.

There were two payments made to satisfy the rent owing, one made by a third party Columbus, and the other by a Northern Crest subsidiary. While the case originally concerned both payments, at the Supreme Court stage the fight was only over about $200,000 paid by the Northern Crest subsidiary.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the question of whether a transaction was only voidable if it actually lowered the amount available to creditors. The other aspects of the test were already met.

Robt Jones Holdings argued the payments were effectively a loan so didn’t actually reduce the pool to creditors.

The lawyer for the liquidators said the voidable transactions regime should be simple and cost-effective, and taking Robt Jones Holdings' approach and analysing the source of payments would create lengthy litigation, as it had in the present case.

After reviewing the law in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, Justices Susan Glazebrook, Mark O’Regan, Ellen France, Terence Arnold and Stephen Kos found in favour of the liquidators.

In a unanimous decision, the judges wrote that even if the payment from the Northern Crest subsidiary was a loan, it was still an insolvent transaction. Liquidators do not need to establish anything more than that there was a payment, the court said.

According to their most recent report, the liquidators have already received about $731,000 from Jones's company which was being on trust pending the outcome of the case.

(BusinessDesk)

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Ground Rules: Government Moves To Protect Best Growing Land

“Continuing to grow food in the volumes and quality we have come to expect depends on the availability of land and the quality of the soil. Once productive land is built on, we can’t use it for food production, which is why we need to act now.” More>>

ALSO:

Royal Society: Calls For Overhaul Of Gene-Technology Regulations

An expert panel considering the implications of new technologies that allow much more controlled and precise ‘editing’ of genes, has concluded it’s time for an overhaul of the regulations and that there’s an urgent need for wide discussion and debate about gene editing... More>>

ALSO:

Retail: Card Spending Dips In July

Seasonally-adjusted electronic card spending dipped in July by 0.1 percent after being flat in June, according to Stats NZ. Economists had expected a 0.5 percent lift, according to the median in a Bloomberg poll. More>>

ALSO:

Product Stewardship: Govt Takes More Action To Reduce Waste

The Government is proposing a new way to deal with environmentally harmful products before they become waste, including plastic packing and bottles, as part of a wider plan to reduce the amount of rubbish ending up in landfills. More>>

ALSO:

Earnings Update: Fonterra Sees Up To $675m Loss On Writedowns

“While the Co-op’s FY19 underlying earnings range is within the current guidance of 10-15 cents per share, when you take into consideration these likely write-downs, we expect to make a reported loss of $590-675 million this year, which is a 37 to 42 cent loss per share." More>>

ALSO: