Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Media Coverage of the Christchurch Mosque Attacks

MEDIA RELEASE

New Zealand and Australian media coverage of the Christchurch mosque attack was poles apart, according to two researchers.

They examined almost 300 stories published by metropolitan newspapers in the days following the attacks, together with web-based content by television broadcasters, and interviewed news executives in both countries.

The researchers are Dr Gavin Ellis, an Auckland media consultant and former editor-in-chief of the New Zealand Herald, and Dr Denis Muller, a Melbourne University researcher and former associate editor of The Age. Their findings have been published this week in Kōtuitui: The New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences, published by the Royal Society Te Aparangi.

They found the intense media coverage exhibited significant disparity in editorial decision-making between the two countries. New Zealand media were focused largely on empathetic coverage of victims and resisted the alleged gunman’s attempts to publicise his cause while their Australian counterparts showed no such reluctance and ran extended coverage of the alleged perpetrator, along with material ruled objectionable in New Zealand.

Ellis and Muller found the editorial focus in each case exhibits the effect of proximity: New Zealand media identified the victims as part of their own community, but the events of 15 March were seen as “foreign” by Australian journalists who used perceived distance as justification for extremely graphic content.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

However, the availability of Australian content online and its re-distribution on social media exposed New Zealand audiences to material judged unacceptable by journalists and news executives in their country.

It raises questions about how, in the internet age, editors need to take account of the fact that their content can be seen by those most closely affected by a horrifying event, and that distance no longer provides the licence it once did to publish material that is distressing to those directly involved.

“The Proximity Filter: The Effect of Distance on Media Coverage of the Christchurch Mosque Attacks” can be accessed on the Kōtuitui: The New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences website at:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1177083X.2019.1705358
ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.