Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

G.E. Protest calls on Nestle to go G.E. Free

PRESS RELEASE
ANTI-GE PROTEST

Genetic Engineering Protest calls on Nestle to go G.E. Free

Friday 20 August

Monarch butterflies cavorted while individuals clad in biohazard suits carried products such as Milo, Milky Bar and Kit Kat, said by Nestle to possibly contain G.E. ingredients.

Thursday 19 August, the anniversary of the defeat of Phillida Bunkle's first genetic engineering bill, saw a group of 60-70 walk through Newmarket to deliver hundreds of letters to Nestle's head office.

The letters call on Nestle to take a proactive approach and immediately label products that contain G.E. ingredients, and to heed the call of its customers and replace them with G.E. free ingredients.

One speaker, Greens candidate Nandor Tanczos said, "labelling is a no brainer. Its outrageous, really. We shouldn't have to be asking for this; it should be taken as a given."

Although the government recently decided to label foods containing G.E. ingredients, Health Minister Wyatt Creech has stated that it won't happen until October 2000, and G.E. campaigners have pointed out other uncertainties in this scheme.*

In Britain, Nestle have gone G.E. free, under public pressure. And in the USA they are quoted** as saying "In countries where public opinion rejects ingredients derived from genetically modified crops, Nestle respects the consumer's preference and will provide its customers...with products that do not contain these ingredients."

"Nestle NZ say they have not heard from people and have not noticed the ongoing boycott on their products" Jon Carapiet, Green Party Northern Region co-spokeserson on genetic engineering, "but now they have hundreds of letters and countless phone calls to show them that indeed New Zealanders do want them to withdraw G.E. ingredients."

ENDS

Further Information Jon Carapiet ph 0064 - 9 - 815 3370 Or via email c/o stu@ihug.co.nz

Nandor Tanczos c/o HempStore ph 0064 - 9 - 302 5255

*Labelling saying "may contain G.E. ingredients" will be allowed, even though many manufacturers were not in favour of this in the recent submissions on labelling policy. And ANZFA still have not given a definition of genetically engineered ingredients, although they were asked in December 1998 to do so by health ministers. It is feared that highly processed ingredients, additives and colourings will escape this definition, and that a level will be set below which labelling will not be needed.

** In a letter to Mothers and Others, who are working on the GE issue with Greenpeace USA


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Ground Rules: Government Moves To Protect Best Growing Land

“Continuing to grow food in the volumes and quality we have come to expect depends on the availability of land and the quality of the soil. Once productive land is built on, we can’t use it for food production, which is why we need to act now.” More>>

ALSO:

Royal Society: Calls For Overhaul Of Gene-Technology Regulations

An expert panel considering the implications of new technologies that allow much more controlled and precise ‘editing’ of genes, has concluded it’s time for an overhaul of the regulations and that there’s an urgent need for wide discussion and debate about gene editing... More>>

ALSO:

Retail: Card Spending Dips In July

Seasonally-adjusted electronic card spending dipped in July by 0.1 percent after being flat in June, according to Stats NZ. Economists had expected a 0.5 percent lift, according to the median in a Bloomberg poll. More>>

ALSO:

Product Stewardship: Govt Takes More Action To Reduce Waste

The Government is proposing a new way to deal with environmentally harmful products before they become waste, including plastic packing and bottles, as part of a wider plan to reduce the amount of rubbish ending up in landfills. More>>

ALSO:

Earnings Update: Fonterra Sees Up To $675m Loss On Writedowns

“While the Co-op’s FY19 underlying earnings range is within the current guidance of 10-15 cents per share, when you take into consideration these likely write-downs, we expect to make a reported loss of $590-675 million this year, which is a 37 to 42 cent loss per share." More>>

ALSO: