News Video | Policy | GPs | Hospitals | Medical | Mental Health | Welfare | Search

 

Sunbeds Not Cool Says Cancer Society

Sunbeds Not Cool Says Cancer Society

It’s a cold hard fact: sunbeds are not cool.

But the message is taking a long time to get through – especially to teenage girls.

With summer holidays around the corner, the Health Sponsorship Council (HSC) and Cancer Society SunSmart partnership is reminding people that it’s not just the sun that that can cause damage leading to skin cancers – not to mention prematurely ageing and disfiguring the skin.

It’s also important people don’t think that they are protecting themselves from damage by getting a “base tan” in a solarium before going outdoors.

“We know from research that many young women think that getting a sunbed tan is safer than getting skin damage from the sun. They’re certainly not currently being told any different as the results of a recent Consumers Institute survey demonstrate,”

says SunSmart spokesperson Wendy Billingsley.

The Consumers Institute investigated the practices of sunbed operators in New Zealand and the results horrified, but did not surprise the Cancer Society.

Of 30 sunbed outlets visited by the Institute, only two met all the requirements specified in the only solarium Standard available in this country – a voluntary one.

“It is especially important that young women with fair skin are made aware of the risks of UV radiation used in sunbeds because those who are at the highest risk of skin cancer later in life are people who have fair skin which always burns and never tans, and those under the age of 15 who have received large doses of ultraviolet radiation, Ms Billingsley says.

The Cancer Society has renewed calls for a compulsory Standard.

“As Consumer points out, there has been a significant increase in use of sunbeds since 2000 – from five to eight percent with about 40 percent of these sunbed bed users visiting a clinic at least once a fortnight.

“And these are just the kinds of people who could be helped by a compulsory Standard to warn them of the risks,” Ms Billingsley says.

“We recommend those under the age of 15 be banned from solariums and those aged 15 to 18 use a solarium only with parental consent.”

Ms Billingsley says if young women can’t be persuaded by the evidence that the UV-A and UV-B rays emitted by sunbeds can potentially cause skin cancers, the Cancer Society and HSC are just as happy if they stop using them because of the ageing effect on their skin.

“Apart from the risk of skin cancer, over-exposure to UV radiation makes the skin dry, wrinkled and less elastic. It may also cause irregular pigmentation. Once this has happened, no fancy creams can reverse the process. The attraction of a tan pales somewhat when you consider that more and more young people in their teens and 20s are developing leathery, lined skin before their time.”

Studies have shown pre-cancerous conditions have also been found in the sunlight-protected but solarium-exposed skin of fair-skinned users after just two to three years of regular solarium use, Ms Billingsley says.

The risk to eyes highlighted by the Consumer research is also endorsed by Ms Billingsley.

She says acute effects of UV radiation on the eye include photokeratitis (inflammation of the cornea and the iris), and photoconjunctivitis (an inflammation of the conjunctiva). Long-term effects may include the development of cataracts, pterygium (white or creamy opaque growth attached to the cornea), and squamous cell cancer of the conjunctiva.

Ms Billingsley emphasises, no solarium can give a safe tan.

“If people feel they must have a tanned skin to look good, there are plenty of fake tan products that give a realistic look without the risks of skin cancer. We tell sun-bathers to fake it, not bake it. Perhaps for sunbedders it could be: Sham for a safer glam.”

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines

 
Legendary Bassist David Friesen Plays Wellington’s Newest Jazz Venue

Friesen is touring New Zealand to promote his latest album Another Time, Another Place, recorded live at Auckland's Creative Jazz Club in 2015. More>>

Howard Davis Review: The Father - Descending Into The Depths of Dementia

Florian Zeller's dazzling drama The Father explores the effects of a deeply unsettling illness that affects 62,000 Kiwis, a number expected to grow to 102,000 by 2030. More>>


Howard Davis Review: Blade Runner Redivivus

When Ridley Scott's innovative, neo-noir, sci-fi flick Blade Runner was originally released in 1982, at a cost of over $45 million, it was a commercial bomb. More>>

14-21 October: New Zealand Improv Festival In Wellington

Imagined curses, Shibuya’s traffic, the apocalypse, and motherhood have little in common, but all these and more serve as inspiration for the eclectic improvised offerings coming to BATS Theatre this October for the annual New Zealand Improv Festival. More>>

ALSO:

Bird Of The Year Off To A Flying Start

The competition asks New Zealanders to vote for their favourite bird in the hopes of raising awareness of the threats they face. More>>

Scoop Review Of Books:
Jenny Abrahamson's John & Charles Enys: Castle Hill Runholders, 1864-1891

This volume will be of interest to a range of readers interested in the South Island high country, New Zealand’s natural environment, and the history of science. More>>

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • CULTURE
  • HEALTH
  • EDUCATION